Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
I went ahead and pushed an 80%-only patch, as you suggest.
All UNIX systems that I know of have getrlimit. Windows does not of
course, but it seems that their stack limit is hard-coded:
http://www.mapleprimes.com/forum/stack_limit
In any case, it
Howdy,
On Wed 01 Apr 2009 15:23, Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
I have no objection to that. We still want to support existing
scripts, of course - but I assume that's why you said mark as
deprecated and not remove. :-)
I agree :) We can
Hi Neil,
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
Should we then put the Makefile.am code back? Or does that break your
uninstalled usage? Other things being equal, I think it's more
important for the generated guile-config to be simple, than for our
Makefile.am to be simple.
Speaking
Hello!
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Tue 31 Mar 2009 14:31, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Besides, there's the thread about cross-compilation where we mention
building the compiler with an already installed Guile that may have an
inappropriate stack limit.
I don't think
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
So, I really intended to wait for review, but it's irritating having
`master' broken, so I went ahead and merged this in.
You waited for 31 hours and I still don't know how it was broken,
which I find irritating as well.
I think the stack calibration stuff
Hello,
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
.scm.go:
$(MKDIR_P) `dirname $...@`
$(top_builddir)/pre-inst-guile \
-l $(top_builddir)/libguile/stack-limit-calibration.scm \
$(top_srcdir)/scripts/compile -o $@ $
This will
Howdy howdy,
On Tue 31 Mar 2009 14:31, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Besides, there's the thread about cross-compilation where we mention
building the compiler with an already installed Guile that may have an
inappropriate stack limit.
I don't think that is relevant. Since the
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
Hi Neil,
Thanks for the review.
Pleasure. By the way, on the general point of pushing
possibly-contentious stuff to git.sv.gnu.org master...
- I certainly don't think it's the end of the world to do this. We
have complete history and can back things out
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
Hey all,
On Fri 27 Mar 2009 16:29, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On the wingo branch in the main repository, you will find the
following patches:
So, I really intended to wait for review, but it's irritating having
`master' broken, so I went ahead
Hey all,
On Fri 27 Mar 2009 16:29, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On the wingo branch in the main repository, you will find the
following patches:
So, I really intended to wait for review, but it's irritating having
`master' broken, so I went ahead and merged this in.
I think the stack
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
Please let me know if yall have a concern with this merge -- we can fix
it tomorrow or Monday.
I'll aim to take a look tomorrow evening.
Neil
11 matches
Mail list logo
