Re: Guile talks at the GNU Hackers Meeting?

I don't think using Skype would go over so well at a GNU hackers meeting. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Shane Celis shane.ce...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Luca, I'd be happy to give a talk regarding the Emacsy[1] GSoC project (video here[2]). The travel costs, however, are a bit prohibitive

Fwd: PATCH - Add cooperative REPL server module

Forgot to CC the list about my updated patch. Forwarding instead. My apologies. - Dave -- Forwarded message -- From: David Thompson dthomps...@worcester.edu Date: Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:31 PM Subject: Re: PATCH - Add cooperative REPL server module To: Mark H Weaver

Re: [PATCH] Test for weak pairs in hash-for-each

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org wrote: David Thompson dthomps...@worcester.edu writes: * libguile/hashtab.c (hash-for-each): Test for deleted weak pairs. Instead of (hash-for-each), it should be (scm_internal_hash_for_each_handle). I went ahead and pushed it,

Re: Use GNU standard for displaying backtraces?

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote: Trying to get Emacs's compilation-mode to support stepping down Guile backtraces, I wrote some elisp code to determine the absolute file name for incomplete relative files that come from Guile's load path, e.g.,

Simple hash table macro

Hello Guile hackers, In the last release, a procedure called 'alist-hash-table' was introduced to provide a convenient way to convert an alist into a hash table. (use-modules (ice-9 hash-table)) (define myhash (alist-hash-table '((parrots . nuts) (monkeys . bananas)

Re: Add support for record types in GOOPS methods?

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Panicz Maciej Godek godek.mac...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! As I managed to find out, the (define-record-type t ...) also introduces a GOOPS class named t. Following your example, you'd need to define your method in the following way: (define-method (foobar (foo

Re: [PATCH] web: http: Accept blank Content-Type headers.

Apologies for the previous email. I seriously botched some keystrokes. On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org wrote: David Thompson da...@gnu.org writes: I encountered a bug in the HTTP header parsing bug when trying to download a file via Guix. The response had a

Re: [PATCH] web: http: Accept blank Content-Type headers.

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org wrote: David Thompson da...@gnu.org writes: I encountered a bug in the HTTP header parsing bug when trying to download a file via Guix. The response had a Content-Type header, but with no value, like so: Content-Type:

Re: Reading data from a file descriptor

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Jan Synáček wrote: > > I have an open fd to a unix socket and I want to read data from it. I > know that the data is going to be only strings, but I don't know the > length in advance. The good thing about using read-string!/partial is, >

Re: Reading data from a file descriptor

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Jan Synáček <jan.syna...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Thompson, David > <dthomps...@worcester.edu> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Jan Synáček <jan.syna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>&g

Re: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > On a more general topic, IIUC Artanis is not an “application” but a > library so maybe it is not a good idea to include it in (index-page) > since it uses the term “applications using Guile“ (The same problem will > apply to

Re: New logo and website design proposal

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote: > On 2015-09-23 11:18, Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote: >> >> >> With the feedback so far, I'm planning to make a revision of the >> mockup this weekend to include the suggested changes. >> > > Hi, > >

Re: New logo and website design proposal

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote: > On 2015-09-16 03:19, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: >> >> Beautiful! >> >> Like Chris, I love the demographically agnostic, yet incredibly inviting >> drawings. I also love the overall crisp and

Re: Guix as a Guile package manager

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Fabio Pesari wrote: > Package managers have been immensely successful in increasing the > popularity of programming languages - think about Perl's CPAN or Ruby's > Gem. But Guile doesn't a package manager, and that in my opinion slows > down its

Re: Contributions to Guile

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Chad Albers wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Christopher Allan Webber > wrote: >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>> Christopher Allan Webber skribis: >>> Chad Albers writes: >>> >>>

Re: random is not random

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Matt Wette wrote: > Every time I execute > $ guile -c '(simple-format #t "~S\n" (random 100))’ > I get the same result. > > Is this a bug? No. You need to initialize the random number generator with a different seed if you want

Re: Attempting to unbox struct fields

Here's a patch I came up with to enable (and fix where necessary) the support for signed integer and double struct fields. Am I on the right track here? Thanks, - Dave From 8bde5c7018fde91cc7140777107bacfb3febb170 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Thompson Date:

Re: Attempting to unbox struct fields

Hi Mark, On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> wrote: > Hi David, > > "Thompson, David" <dthomps...@worcester.edu> writes: >> Here's a patch I came up with to enable (and fix where necessary) the >> support for signed integer

Re: Attempting to unbox struct fields

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> wrote: > "Thompson, David" <dthomps...@worcester.edu> writes: > >>> The first thing I noticed is that the patch assumes that doubles are the >>> same size as pointers. Obviously this

Re: fork pipe dup2 exec

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Tobias Reithmaier wrote: > Hello, > > is there a way to program a Inter Process Communication (IPC) in guile like > you do it with the Linux-Libc-API with the combo fork, pipe, dup2 and exec? > If you use the popen-module it's not the same

Re: Setting up CI for Guile

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Wilfred Hughes wrote: > Hi folks > > I'm a big fan of CI (automated testing), and maybe you are too. I'd > love to have CI for reviewing patches of Guile. This is a good idea. > So, I decided to set it up! This isn't something that's

Re: Slow compilation of guile-2.1.x

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:47 AM, Jan Synáček wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:36 AM, wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:31:23AM +0100, Jan Synáček wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> while building

Re: [PATCH] Add unboxed floating point comparison instructions.

Here is an updated patch. All of the code is the same but I added docs in doc/ref/vm.texi. - Dave From 7d8017812a77489f362c2b9b97ee0988e5d3d7bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Thompson Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:46:08 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Add unboxed floating

Re: [PATCH] Add unboxed floating point comparison instructions.

Hi Andy, On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Mon 09 Jan 2017 02:09, "Thompson, David" <dthomps...@worcester.edu> writes: > >> + /* br-if-f64= a:12 b:12 invert:1 _:7 offset:24 > > Missing - before the =. > >>

Re: [PATCH] Add unboxed floating point comparison instructions.

Hi Andy, On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Mon 09 Jan 2017 02:09, "Thompson, David" <dthomps...@worcester.edu> writes: > >> + /* br-if-f64= a:12 b:12 invert:1 _:7 offset:24 > > Missing - before the =. > >>

Re: [PATCH] Add unboxed floating point comparison instructions.

Hello Andy and Mark, Thanks for taking the time to review this patch and bearing with me as a I stumble around the compiler. I've attached a new patch and have some additionally commentary below: On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Andy Wingo

Re: [PATCH] Add unboxed floating point comparison instructions.

Hi Andy, Thanks for the feedback. I believe this new patch addresses everything you asked me to fix. Am I in time for 2.1.6? ;) - Dave From bfd7b4f343c5f5cc8761c8d1fed1f61ba564a5dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Thompson Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:46:08 -0500

Re: What's required to include sxml->html?

>From what I can tell, this is more-or-less my (haunt html) module [0] with the import/export syntax changed and a hack to special-case

Re: Website translations with Haunt

Hey everyone! On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi! > > "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > >> I want to ask for your thoughts on my new solution since translations >> are probably important to many Haunt users. In

Re: Guile 3 update, August edition

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: > In this particular example, the JITted code runs about 3x faster than > the interpreted code. The JIT doesn't do register allocation; not sure > precisely how to do that. A future topic. For the moment I want to > consolidate what we have

Re: Simple picture language

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Hi Guilers, > > I wrote a simple SVG-based picture language. Wow! I never would have thought to use sxml to generate svg files. I always thought we would have to use cairo or some custom renderer in order to have a

unboxing floats in libguile procedures that always return floats?

Hello all, Guile's current floating point unboxing optimizations are great and have helped me immensely, but they still leave something to be desired. I often find myself often calling libguile procedures such as sin, cos, and random:uniform. These procedures always return floats, yet Guile

Re: [ANN] Guile-SDL2 0.4.0 released

Apologies! Meant to send to guile-user. :(

[ANN] Guile-SDL2 0.4.0 released

I'm happy to announce that Guile-SDL2 0.4.0 has been released! Guile-SDL2 provides bindings for the SDL2 game programming library. The bindings are written in pure Scheme using Guile's foreign function interface. This release features several new bindings: * SDL_BlitScaled * SDL_BlitSurface *

Re: guile 3 update, halloween edition

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:55 PM Andy Wingo wrote: > > Thoughts welcome! Also: should these structured error objects be named > exceptions or conditions? SRFI-35, R6RS, and R7RS say "conditions", but > racket and my heart say "exceptions"; wdyt? I think "exceptions" is a better name for the

Re: conflicts in the gnu project now affect guile

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:33 AM Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > > Mark H Weaver writes: > > > [resending with fixed headers, for proper threading] > > > > Hi Christopher, > > > > Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > >> I think *RMS's* action of unilaterally re-appointing Mark without > >>

Re: conflicts in the gnu project now affect guile

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:14 AM Andy Wingo wrote: > > Perhaps this moment is an opportunity, to see where the Guile community > stands. In that spirit I invite Guile community members to weigh in on > the issue. What do you think about Guile's continued relationship with > GNU? What about its

Re: Relaxing the copyright assignment policy

Hi Ludovic and Andy, Great news! Thanks for lowering the barrier to entry for new contributors! - Dave

Re: [EXT] (ice-9 base64)?

+1 to that. I do the same thing in my own projects. Guix does it, too. - Dave On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 12:11 PM Aleix Conchillo Flaqué < aconchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In many projects I've been copying Göran Weinholt's base64 implementation > and I've also seen it in other projects,

Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] Add 'bytevector-slice'.

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:34 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > What could be convenient though is ‘bytevector-copy’ (no bang), which > would combine ‘make-bytevector’ + ‘bytevector-copy!’. 'bytevector-copy' already exists, or do you mean some different implementation of it? - Dave

Re: [PATCH] Add 'bytevector-slice'.

Hi Ludovic, On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:00 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > +@node Bytevector Slices > +@subsubsection Bytevector Slices > + > +@cindex subset, of a bytevector > +@cindex slice, of a bytevector > +@cindex slice, of a uniform vector > +As an extension to the R6RS specification, the

Re: GNU Guile 3.0.9rc1 available for testing!

Hi Ludo, On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 10:58 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Please report any issues you may find. I’m particularly interested in > portability regressions (NetBSD and other BSDs, macOS, MinGW, as well as > architectures other than x86_64). I was curious about the MinGW build, so I

Re: Functional datatypes in Guile

Hi pukkamustard, On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 3:34 AM pukkamustard wrote: > > > I've been using SRFI-146 > (https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-146/srfi-146.html) for functional > mappings. There's a Guile port: > https://inqlab.net/git/guile-srfi-146.git/ (also in Guix - > guile-srfi-146). Your Guile

Re: The message chain with an happy ending

On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 6:43 AM Blake Shaw via Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library wrote: > > I think the guile mailing list has come to suffer seriously from a policing > of what is appropriate for discussion. When I first started getting into > guile at the beginning of

Re: Guile 64-bit Windows support, redux

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 5:40 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 22:04 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > > > Ping, any comments on this approach? I built binaries for LilyPond > > 2.25.10 using these patches applied on top

Re: Guile 64-bit Windows support, redux

On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 3:19 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 09:19 -0500, Thompson, David wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 5:40 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via Developers list for > > Guile, the GNU extensibility library wrote: > > > > > > On T

Re: Guile 64-bit Windows support, redux

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 4:29 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > So I can confirm that JIT indeed doesn't work right now on 64-bit > MinGW, but it's relatively easy to fix (first patch). In essence > lightening was getting the calling convention wrong. Wow! Have you seen the JIT do its thing (via

Re: Guile 64-bit Windows support, redux

On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 11:09 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-03-20 at 16:40 -0400, Thompson, David wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 4:29 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > > So I can confirm that JIT indeed doesn't work right now on 64-bit > > > MinGW, b