Re: 1.8 ‘send’ bug + re-engagement

2012-09-24 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Thanks for the update! Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org skribis: i'd like to apply the fix myself (in the savannah repo), onto ‘branch_release-1-8’. Yes, please do! Can you apply it to stable-2.0 as well? Sorry, no; i lack sufficient bandwidth. OK, I’ll do it if nobody

Re: 1.8 ‘send’ bug + re-engagement

2012-09-20 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) () Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:24:26 +0200 Looking to move WIKID[0] out of the Guile 1.4.x ghetto (which is pretty cozy, i must say), (Speaking of which, do let me know when rpx has left the ghetto, too. :-)) OK, will do. If the world doesn't end, a

Re: 1.8 ‘send’ bug + re-engagement

2012-08-26 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Mike Gran spk...@yahoo.com skribis: The big issues with moving to 2.0 that I've seen expressed are non-portability, I don’t think 2.0 is less portable than 1.8; there’s room for improvement (MinGW, pthread support), but it’s not a disaster either. number of dependencies, There’s are

Re: 1.8 ‘send’ bug + re-engagement

2012-08-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Thien-Thi! Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org skribis: Looking to move WIKID[0] out of the Guile 1.4.x ghetto (which is pretty cozy, i must say), (Speaking of which, do let me know when rpx has left the ghetto, too. :-)) i ran into a Guile 1.8 problem. Apparently, ‘send’ gratuitously

Re: 1.8 ‘send’ bug + re-engagement

2012-08-25 Thread Mike Gran
From: Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org I imagine if this particular fix goes smoothly, i will be motivated to continue w/ this kind of maintenance work, where the focus is on continuity and stability (perhaps likewise showing 1.6 and 1.4 some love, as well). Hmm, I’d find it more