Hi, I was just wondering: `test-error' from (srfi srfi-64) gives a pass
if it catches an exception, but it doesn't seem to care whether or not
the exception caught matches what you told it to expect. Is this a bug?
--
Christopher Howard
p: +1 (907) 374-0257
w: https://librehacker.com
social
On 10/23/19 1:24 AM, Chris Vine wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 21:23:32 +0200
> Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
> [snip]
>> The reason however, why I have only ever used Riot with one person is,
>> surprise surprise, that most people are not willing to sacrifice the
>> tiniest bit of comfort, for
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 21:23:32 +0200
Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
[snip]
> The reason however, why I have only ever used Riot with one person is,
> surprise surprise, that most people are not willing to sacrifice the
> tiniest bit of comfort, for enhanced security. This one person I used it
> with
Zelphir Kaltstahl writes:
> To verify another person's device, one has to exchange information via a
> second trusted channel. That information is a sequence of icons being
> shown. If they are the same, that the other person sends you via the
> second trusted channel, you can reasonably assume,
Hi!
I just want to share my experience with Riot.
I have used it before. In fact, I used it to communicate with only one
person so far for reasons I will mention below. Today there was a
strange thing, when Riot showed an error and warned, that it could be a
replay attack. This is not the first
Hi Todor,
Todor Kondić writes:
> [...] I've set up my workflows around Guix, git(lab)
> and a customised Emacs installation (instead of R Studio). My small
> team of science students (majority female, various cultural
> backgrounds), never previously exposed to a GNU system to such an
>
