Hello,
I would also use Zelphir's approach and pass query parameters as an alist,
the reason is because then you can dynamically generate that alist more
easily if needed and even pass it around, and it looks nicer to me but
that's a personal choice. I would also actually make that an optional
On Thursday, 8 July 2021 16:37:09 CEST you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeking advice for passing simple key-value pairs to a function and
> generate a string out of these values. Neither the names not the number
> of keys is known in advance.
>
> Background: This shall become a generic function for
Hi!
I think I would give the pairs together in an association list and use alist
procedures to work with that. Then you could also only have one backtick, at the
start of the alist:
`((attr . ,val)
(attr . ,val)
(attr . ,val)
(attr . ,val))
Looks simpler to me and fewer special
