Mark H Weaver writes:
> Christopher Howard writes:
>
>> Hi, is the a way I could use goops such that I the classes are non-
>> mutating, but have setters that simply return a new instance of the
>> class (instead of modifying the original)?
>
> We provide such a
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Christopher Howard
wrote:
> Hi, is the a way I could use goops such that I the classes are non-
> mutating, but have setters that simply return a new instance of the
> class (instead of modifying the original)?
I'm not too familiar
Hi, is the a way I could use goops such that I the classes are non-
mutating, but have setters that simply return a new instance of the
class (instead of modifying the original)?
I suppose I could simply use define-method to create setter methods
which create a new instance of the object; but