Sorry, I said something wrong in my previous email.
The SRFI-64 specification does not mention the possibility of providing
an arbitrary predicate. That's a feature supported by my R7RS-based
implementation of SRFI-64:
https://github.com/TaylanUB/scheme-srfis/tree/master/srfi/64
(The file
Note however that such error tests are inherently non-portable (except in
R6RS systems only) and should be avoided when testing code intended to be
portable.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:20 PM Taylan Kammer
wrote:
> On 23.10.2019 06:37, Christopher Howard wrote:
> > Hi, I was just wondering:
On 23.10.2019 06:37, Christopher Howard wrote:
> Hi, I was just wondering: `test-error' from (srfi srfi-64) gives a pass
> if it catches an exception, but it doesn't seem to care whether or not
> the exception caught matches what you told it to expect. Is this a bug?
The (test-error ...) form
Hi, I was just wondering: `test-error' from (srfi srfi-64) gives a pass
if it catches an exception, but it doesn't seem to care whether or not
the exception caught matches what you told it to expect. Is this a bug?
--
Christopher Howard
p: +1 (907) 374-0257
w: https://librehacker.com
social
