On 5/7/06, Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that this explains why the export is not necessary (and hence
why it works without it). But I don't yet understand why adding the
export messes things up.
In the current module system, the effect of mentioning a variable in
an export
Mikael Djurfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 5/4/06, Marco Maggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, with the following and no EXPORT invocation
it works.
Actually, logically this *is* how the code should be structured. If
you had created a novel generic function within your module, that
Marco Maggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not understand why the first solution does not work;
I've tried different combinations of functions but there is
something I am missing.
Damn... it seems to work if I do not EXPORT the generic
methods.
You mean if you
Neil Jerram wrote:
Marco Maggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not understand why the first solution does not work;
I've tried different combinations of functions but there is
something I am missing.
Damn... it seems to work if I do not EXPORT the generic
methods.
On 5/4/06, Marco Maggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Jerram wrote:
Marco Maggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not understand why the first solution does not work;
I've tried different combinations of functions but there is
something I am missing.
Damn... it seems
Hi,
I am trying to add a new number class, export generic
methods from a module and import them into another one. If I
ignore the GOOPS tutorial and read only the reference, it is
my understanting that I should do:
;;
;; exporting.scm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not understand why the first solution does not work;
I've tried different combinations of functions but there is
something I am missing.
Damn... it seems to work if I do not EXPORT the generic
methods.
--
Marco Maggi