Re: Compilation to js [Update]

Ian Price writes: > I would like to be able to access Javascript functions from Scheme, > possibly with a (system foreign) type API, but this is not a priority > at the moment. Getting as much of Scheme as possible working is the > main thing. On my list, you could put it

Re: Compilation to js [Update]

Ian Price writes: > As for residualisation, it's not a technical term. More accurate > terminology would be serialisation of syntax objects. Maybe you can > interpret my use of "residue", as being partly negative, as residue is > something left over at the end of a process.

Re: Compilation to js [Update]

I would like to be able to access Javascript functions from Scheme, possibly with a (system foreign) type API, but this is not a priority at the moment. Getting as much of Scheme as possible working is the main thing. On my list, you could put it as the unspoken 5th stage. As for

Re: Compilation to js [Update]

Hi Ian, Ian Price writes: > I think the approach using the dominator functions in (language cps > utils) is the right way, and is giving the results I want. I intend to > write a blog post shortly explaining how dominators / cps-soup work > and how to compile from it for