>> Another possible solution is to ship our own bootstrap binary (like we >> do with Guile and Bash). But first, I’ll try to patch it. Are you OK >> with that?
> With shipping a binary of GHC? Well, if that’s the only reasonable way > to do it, then yes. > GNU/MIT Scheme does that for instance, but that’s “their > responsibility”, not ours. Does the GHC project distribute binaries for > bootstrapping purposes? Yes. Actually, I’m trying to package a binary version of GHC [1], but I was talking about shipping ‘ghc-cabal’. Again, I think that patching is a better solution. [1] http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.0.1/ghc-7.0.1-i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2
pgpGsDsG_xUXg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
