Leo Famulari writes:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:15:29PM +0800, Alex Vong wrote:
>> This patch (applied to core-updates) fixes the two CVEs disclosed recently.
>
> Can you send a patch for the master branch instead? The patches should
> be applied to mupdf/fixed in (gnu packages pdf).
Sure, her
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:10:04AM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
Guix, John,
On 02/03/17 18:02, John Darrington wrote:
> commit f1021afb41613f5eba3ea4f5225b9a4cd1c15ecb
> Author: John Darrington
> Date: Thu Mar 2 17:57:25 2017 +0100
>
> gnu: Me
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:13:53 -0500
> Mark H Weaver wrote:
>
>> If the purpose here is to facilitate mutating anything in the store,
>
> That's not what it does. It's used in the profile hook. 'union-build
> is basically just reused to avoid code duplication. See PAT
Guix, John,
On 02/03/17 18:02, John Darrington wrote:
> commit f1021afb41613f5eba3ea4f5225b9a4cd1c15ecb
> Author: John Darrington
> Date: Thu Mar 2 17:57:25 2017 +0100
>
> gnu: Merge the two stellaria into one.
Nicely caught.
This made me curious and turned up three similar packages:
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 03:30:59PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:05:04AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> > So, here’s a plan:
>> >
>> > • Once Efraim has pushed some of the aarch64 patches, do another
>> > evaluation of the “core” package
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 12:25:14AM +0100, Mekeor Melire wrote:
> From d235a347a21d50902d42f161a6c840516eff9d42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mekeor Melire
> Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 00:22:47 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add dzen.
>
> * gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm (dzen): New variable.
Thanks, push
>From d235a347a21d50902d42f161a6c840516eff9d42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mekeor Melire
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 00:22:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add dzen.
* gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm (dzen): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm | 52
1
ng0 writes:
> while updating PyBitmessage I ran (again) into python syntax issues, how
> to escape them.
> There's a "Press the Anykey" variant in there which needs to be removed
I’d just patch out the “if detectPrereqs” part to ensure that the prompt
never appears.
~~ Ricardo
Hi,
while updating PyBitmessage I ran (again) into python syntax issues, how
to escape them.
There's a "Press the Anykey" variant in there which needs to be removed
(and it's not just specific to Guix, but as I already said on freenode
IRC I'm burnt out on upstreaming to PyBitmessage, won't do it)
* gnu/services/ssh.scm (openssh-config-file): Remove them.
()[rsa-authentication?]: Remove it.
()[protocol-number]: Remove it.
* doc/guix.texi (Networking Services): Remove them.
---
doc/guix.texi| 8
gnu/services/ssh.scm | 10 --
2 files changed, 18 deletions(-)
diff --
* gnu/services/ssh.scm (openssh-config-file): Add 'print-last-log?' option.
()[print-last-log?]: Add it.
(openssh-activation): Touch /var/log/lastlog.
* doc/guix.texi (Networking Services): Document 'print-last-log?'.
Before that, the service did not work as expected because /var/log/lastlog did
n
* gnu/services/ssh.scm: (openssh-pam-services): New procedure.
(openssh-service-type): Use it to extend PAM-ROOT-SERVICE-TYPE.
()[challenge-response-authentication?]: New field.
()[use-pam?]: New field.
(openssh-config-file): Add them.
* doc/guix.texi (Networking Services): Document them.
---
doc/
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:53:54 +0100
> Clément Lassieur wrote:
>
>> * gnu/services/ssh.scm (openssh-config-file): Add 'pring-last-log?' option.
> ^ typo
Done.
>> ()[print-last-log?]: Add it.
>> (op
Hi Danny,
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:53:55 +0100
> Clément Lassieur wrote:
>> +This is a list of two-element tuples,
>
> list of pairs.
>
>>where each tuple contains the
>
> each pair
>
>> +subsystem name and a command (with optional arguments) to execute upon
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:15:29PM +0800, Alex Vong wrote:
> This patch (applied to core-updates) fixes the two CVEs disclosed recently.
Can you send a patch for the master branch instead? The patches should
be applied to mupdf/fixed in (gnu packages pdf).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatur
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 03:30:59PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:05:04AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > So, here’s a plan:
> >
> > • Once Efraim has pushed some of the aarch64 patches, do another
> > evaluation of the “core” package set for that branch, and check
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:37:07PM +0100, julien lepiller wrote:
> From 10ab0fc95f83dbb291179cbf525d4bef196a827f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Julien Lepiller
> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 11:09:11 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: gd: Fix an issue with XBM decoding.
>
> * gnu/packages/patches/gd-p
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:55:30PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> julien lepiller writes:
>
> > Le 2017-03-01 16:34, julien lepiller a écrit :
> >> I've "fixed" the glib failure by disabling a test. Attached are
> >> patches I would like to see in core-updates. If it's too late to add
> >> the patc
julien lepiller writes:
> Le 2017-03-01 16:34, julien lepiller a écrit :
>> I've "fixed" the glib failure by disabling a test. Attached are
>> patches I would like to see in core-updates. If it's too late to add
>> the patch for gd, then I would like to keep gd-for-php. This time I've
>> tested t
Le 2017-03-01 16:34, julien lepiller a écrit :
I've "fixed" the glib failure by disabling a test. Attached are
patches I would like to see in core-updates. If it's too late to add
the patch for gd, then I would like to keep gd-for-php. This time I've
tested them and php works.
A better version
Hello Rene
On 02/28/2017 07:45 AM, ren...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to export the variable 'CONFFLAGS' for 'apr' package on
> GNU/Hurd as follows:
>
> (arguments
> #:make-flags ("CONFFLAGS+=apr_cv_struct_ipmreq=no"
> (string-append "PREFIX=" %outpu
Hello Rene,
I added a line in your commit message saying in which file you apply the
patch and also removed all the one space indentation changes, with the
purpose of making the patch more clear.
I pushed it in core-updates.
Thank you for working on this!
Manolis
On 03/02/2017 03:34 AM, ren...@
Dear Guix,
To write a derivation builder that can turn a G-expression into a
derivation, it would be handy to expose two functions that are currently
not in the interface of (guix gexp).
Here's an example:
(define* (process->bash-engine-derivation proc #:key (guile (default-guile)))
"Return an
I've just found out we have guix-patches now! We should continue the
discussion in the bug report instead of guix-devel.
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
This patch (applied to core-updates) fixes the two CVEs disclosed recently.
I am currently testing the patch. I think the patch works but it is
st
Hello,
This patch (applied to core-updates) fixes the two CVEs disclosed recently.
I am currently testing the patch. I think the patch works but it is
still building right now.
From a5bb1e9601d8bb3e48fdb521e6d1821dd5d9c833 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Vong
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 19:59:05
John Darrington writes:
> I don't have any strong opinions here. But if somebody feels that we really
> cannot
> have this program in Guix, then go ahead and revert it.
>
> In the meantime I will try to contact the authors and ask for clarification.
> However
> since the project has been ina
Hi Ludo,
On 10/02/17 08:32, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi Ben,
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
I'm quite happy to send these patches in, pplacer has been near the
top of my most wanted list since I started contributing. There's two
parts that are a little out of the ordinary:
1) Unfortunately pplacer re
Just for future reference this was fixed with commit
751702676e0dcf39657082138f45340b65ae4d3e.
Manolis
On 02/24/2017 04:17 PM, Manolis Ragkousis wrote:
> I am already into it. The sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bits/fcntl-linux.h
> part is the problem.
>
> I was thinking on breaking the patch into two
John Darrington writes:
> Also pertinent:
>
> This program is listed in https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Unrar-free
>
As Leo has pointed out, I have mistoken it as another program. So it
should be fine!
> J'
>
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 06:54:24AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> I don't have a
29 matches
Mail list logo
