Re: Guix on aarch64

2018-08-28 Thread Mark H Weaver
Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> I commented specifically on Leo’s statement about build debugging on >> Cuirass: >> >> “I don't actually do any build debugging with Berlin yet because I >> don't know how to use the interface

Re: Guix on aarch64

2018-08-28 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > I commented specifically on Leo’s statement about build debugging on > Cuirass: > > “I don't actually do any build debugging with Berlin yet because I > don't know how to use the interface effectively.” > > This did not

Re: [Next browser] Common Lisp: mgl-pax: Package SWANK-BACKEND does not exist.

2018-08-28 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
Thanks for the details. Here is the full backtrace when I attempt to build sbcl-slime-swank with PR #433 (https://github.com/slime/slime/pull/433): --8<---cut here---start->8--- > ./pre-inst-env guix build -K sbcl-slime-swank ;;; note: source file

Re: Help needed: Updating GHC to 8.4.3

2018-08-28 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hey Tim, thank you so much for helping with GHC! > To summarize, there are three problems with the original patch: > > 1. it uses “ld.bfd” instead of “ld” (skipping the wrapper); > 2. it references native tools instead of target tools; and > 3. it requires certain tools to be available

Re: Guix on aarch64

2018-08-28 Thread Mark H Weaver
Andreas Enge writes: > Hello, > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> I can remove one of the build machines from Berlin. > > would this not aggravate the problem with the availability of substitutes? > As I understand it, then we would have two separate machines,

Re: [ANN] Emacs-Build-Farm 0.2

2018-08-28 Thread Clément Lassieur
Alex Kost writes: > Hello, > > Let me announce Emacs-Build-Farm – Emacs interface for Hydra and Cuirass > (build farms used by Nix and Guix). This is a successor of > "guix-hydra-…" code from ‘emacs-guix’ package. > > It can be installed from Guix (after "guix pull"): > > guix package -i

Re: Guix on aarch64

2018-08-28 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello, On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > I can remove one of the build machines from Berlin. would this not aggravate the problem with the availability of substitutes? As I understand it, then we would have two separate machines, each of which would build the same

[ANN] Emacs-Build-Farm 0.2

2018-08-28 Thread Alex Kost
Hello, Let me announce Emacs-Build-Farm – Emacs interface for Hydra and Cuirass (build farms used by Nix and Guix). This is a successor of "guix-hydra-…" code from ‘emacs-guix’ package. It can be installed from Guix (after "guix pull"): guix package -i emacs-build-farm In short,

Re: Guix on aarch64

2018-08-28 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Mark, > Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> I think you are overreacting and I really don’t think the sarcastic >> response is justified. This kind of communication is very demotivating >> to me. > > Believe it or not, I wasn't conscious of the fact that I was being > sarcastic or hostile. Sorry

Re: [Next browser] Common Lisp: mgl-pax: Package SWANK-BACKEND does not exist.

2018-08-28 Thread Andy Patterson
Hi Pierre, On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:42:27 +0200 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: [...] > One thing I'd like to understand about Common Lisp packages in Guix, > if you can shed some light on this: the build system uses ASDF to > "bundle compile" the entire package into a > single