Op za 24 nov. 2018 om 16:38 schreef Pjotr Prins :
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 03:41:35PM +, Jelle Licht wrote:
> >Hey swedebugia,
> >I will still send a more elaborate reply to the general npm-importer
> >thread later this week, but we can assume that generally these
> >
names for packages are (mostly) random, although in some
cases following classiifcations (see python-*, r-*, ...).
The Qt part of Octave is a separate package because making
it just an output would still pull in Qt and the size difference
is huge.
Alex Vong transcribed 856 bytes:
> Hello,
>
>
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 03:41:35PM +, Jelle Licht wrote:
>Hey swedebugia,
>I will still send a more elaborate reply to the general npm-importer
>thread later this week, but we can assume that generally these
>recursive dependencies can be untangled by looking at the different
>
Hey swedebugia,
I will still send a more elaborate reply to the general npm-importer
thread later this week, but we can assume that generally these
recursive dependencies can be untangled by looking at the different
versions of the dependencies.
So in your example, I imagine an input chain like:
Hi
We need to wonder about what to do with cyclic dependencies.
In the case below node-rimraf has node-glob in input and node-glob has
node-rimraf in NATIVE-input.
I have no idea how to solve this. Both packages are by the same author.
Same problem with jasmine and jasmine-core
Done!
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Pjotr Prins writes:
> I think we can now drop the unsupported versions. I was using 1.8
> until quite recently ;). These packages can be put into channels for
> those who need that.
>
Ok, so we can drop them for guix. But I think we should still try to fix
as many CVEs as possible even if we
On 2018-11-22 09:36, Julien Lepiller wrote:
Thanks! It made me wonder if we could better approximate the set of needed
dependencies by looking at package tags. I'll try to improve my script in that
spirit, and share it again here.
Sounds good.
I would like to work on implementing a way to
Hi
On 2018-11-20 08:50, Julien Lepiller wrote:
snip
I'll push what I have to a wip-branch latter today. The reason why I develop
out-of-tree is because I can always rebase my patches.
I don't see it in guix yet. Could you push it?
I corrected a bug in node-build-system and added
Hello,
Brett Gilio writes:
> Hey all,
>
> Happy guix birthday!
>
> Quick question, why is the octave package split up into two different
> public definitions, rather than just having the QtOctave-GUI being a
> "gui" output, like it is for transmissionBT and some others?
>
I would also want to
Hi Ludo,
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:52:42 +0100
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> --
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
