Hi Pierre,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 08:51, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>
> Can we still do the following:
>
> - Leave colors when INSIDE_EMACS is set.
It is what I propose. But this a "bug" in the patches that I sent. The
'link' is turned off and the 'highlight' is still set on but the
display is with
I've done a bit of work on the port and my two branches live here¹ and
here². On master I get as far as gcc-cross-boot0. Core-updates does much
better, getting to glibc-intermediate, where it fails to build since it
says it can't find nptl. Searching the Guix tree I see that there's some
references
Hi Pierre,
On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 13:54 +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Error verifying signature: Failed to execute gpg.
> I've just sent a patch: 39...@debbugs.gnu.org.
>
> Ideally, it would need a bit more testing with a package that has
> subdirectories.
> Any good suggestion?
>
Thank y
Hello Guix,
This is my second letter on this subject. My question is still the
same, are we willing to provide funding for more than one Outreachy
intern?
Additional information:
1. We have 3 proposals listed.
2. We confirmed funding for 1 intern.
3. Funding per intern is 6500 USD.
4. I am aware
We are pleased to announce the GNU Shepherd version 0.7.0, a bug-fix
release.
• About
The GNU Daemon Shepherd or GNU Shepherd is a service manager written
in Guile that looks after the herd of system services. It provides a
replacement for the service-managing capabilities of SysV-init (or
Hi Marius,
On +2020-02-16 17:34:13 +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Bengt Richter writes:
>
> > Hi Efraim,
> >
> > On +2020-02-16 16:55:17 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 03:27:36PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> >> > guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
> >> >
> >> > > commit 481a
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 05:24:22PM +0100, Bengt Richter wrote:
> Hi Efraim,
>
> On +2020-02-16 16:55:17 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 03:27:36PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> > > guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
> > >
> > > > commit 481a0f1a7ceac666a011b28324220584ead07698
Bengt Richter writes:
> Hi Efraim,
>
> On +2020-02-16 16:55:17 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 03:27:36PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> > guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
>> >
>> > > commit 481a0f1a7ceac666a011b28324220584ead07698
>> > > Author: Efraim Flashner
>> > > Autho
Hi Efraim,
On +2020-02-16 16:55:17 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 03:27:36PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> > guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
> >
> > > commit 481a0f1a7ceac666a011b28324220584ead07698
> > > Author: Efraim Flashner
> > > AuthorDate: Thu Feb 13 10:54:29 2020 +02
Hello Guixers,
The 'staging' branch is awaiting your patches. The next freeze date
will be Monday, February 24th.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 03:27:36PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
>
> > commit 481a0f1a7ceac666a011b28324220584ead07698
> > Author: Efraim Flashner
> > AuthorDate: Thu Feb 13 10:54:29 2020 +0200
> >
> > build: gnu-build-system: Don't run configure during bootstrap.
Hey,
I noticed that the dev86 package was a bit odd from looking at the
package reproducibility page in the Guix Data Service, it was appearing
in the "Matching" section for all architectures, which seemed a bit odd
[1].
1:
http://data.guix.gnu.org/revision/3c6aca4232d1a3638ec962bc7afe9121626c43
guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
> commit 481a0f1a7ceac666a011b28324220584ead07698
> Author: Efraim Flashner
> AuthorDate: Thu Feb 13 10:54:29 2020 +0200
>
> build: gnu-build-system: Don't run configure during bootstrap.
>
> * guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm (bootstrap): Add NOCONFIGURE
We are pleased to announce the release of the GNU Guix Workflow
Language version 0.2.0, representing 383 commits by 3 people.
This release contains a number of big, incompatible changes compared
to the previous release 0.1.1. The "guix process" command has been
removed in favor of a single "guix
zimoun writes:
> Recently, the source of package was missing and so "guix time-machine"
> was broken [1]. It is not the first time that it appears [2]; patches
> are coming... :-)
>
> Using the Software Heritage (SWH) API [3], does it seems a good idea
> to add SWH coverage somewhere in the Guix
15 matches
Mail list logo
