Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2020-02-19 Thread Christopher Lemmer Webber
Dimakakos Dimos writes: > Pierre Neidhardt writes: > >> I've (finally) pushed racket-minimal. >> Hooray! >> >> Now to the Racket importer... Anyone? >> Dimakakos? :) > > Nice! It will be very useful. I've put some research into a build system > for racket, and sadly it isn't trivial to match the

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2020-02-19 Thread Dimakakos Dimos
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > I've (finally) pushed racket-minimal. > Hooray! > > Now to the Racket importer... Anyone? > Dimakakos? :) Nice! It will be very useful. I've put some research into a build system for racket, and sadly it isn't trivial to match the racket package system to guix.

Re: Extending Guix without using the Guile load path

2020-02-19 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 19 février 2020 14:46:55 GMT-05:00, "Gábor Boskovits" a écrit : >This looks interesting. > >Ricardo Wurmus ezt írta (időpont: 2020. febr. 19., >Sze >16:37): > >> Hi Guix, >> >> I think it’s a bit difficult to install the Guix Workflow Language at >> this point and I’d like to change that. >>

Re: Extending Guix without using the Guile load path

2020-02-19 Thread Gábor Boskovits
This looks interesting. Ricardo Wurmus ezt írta (időpont: 2020. febr. 19., Sze 16:37): > Hi Guix, > > I think it’s a bit difficult to install the Guix Workflow Language at > this point and I’d like to change that. > > Currently, new sub-commands for Guix are looked up by module name on the >

Re: lots of numbers when building Guix

2020-02-19 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 19 février 2020 11:29:43 GMT-05:00, Ricardo Wurmus a écrit : >Hi Guix, > >I just ran “make” in my Guix source checkout and saw this: > >--8<---cut here---start->8--- >… >cd . && /bin/sh /home/rekado/dev/gx/branches/master/build-aux/missing >automake-1.16

Re: WIP gnu: poetry: Update to 1.0.3.

2020-02-19 Thread Tanguy Le Carrour
Hi Guix, Here is an update on my work to update Poetry to version 1.0.3. I have a working version that I've been using for 2 weeks, but I had to "downgrade" some requirements to make it work: ``` (substitute* "setup.py" (("pexpect>=4.7.0,<5.0.0") "pexpect>=4.6.0,<5.0.0")

lots of numbers when building Guix

2020-02-19 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Guix, I just ran “make” in my Guix source checkout and saw this: --8<---cut here---start->8--- … cd . && /bin/sh /home/rekado/dev/gx/branches/master/build-aux/missing automake-1.16 --gnu Makefile configure.ac:23: warning: The 'AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' macro is

Extending Guix without using the Guile load path

2020-02-19 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Guix, I think it’s a bit difficult to install the Guix Workflow Language at this point and I’d like to change that. Currently, new sub-commands for Guix are looked up by module name on the Guile load path. When installing the “gwl” package, though, the Guile load path is not automatically

Re: New build system: copy-build-system

2020-02-19 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
If you've got time, could you try my patch with PaperWM then to see if it does the job for you? I'd like to get some feedback before merging :) -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Using the Hetzner Cloud

2020-02-19 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen
Heya, Giovanni Biscuolo writes: > Hello Alex, > > Alex Sassmannshausen writes: > > [...] > >> Now I use a different approach: deploy a debian server then use a >> guix-infect style script (gleaned from the guix deploy code for digital >> ocean). > > could you please share that "guix-infect"