On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:14:19PM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote:
> I agree that auto updaters should be disabled where applicable. But,
> ideally, like you said, this should be implemented upstream as a
> configuration option we can set at build time.
I also agree we should make an effort to disable
Hi Vagrant,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:08:59PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I did some quick reproducibility testing running GNU Guix, and so far
> got pretty good results:
>
> Using guix (and packages) built from commit:
> f83d07f7778b699d46741a5667113342f5f0a737
>
> $ guix challenge
On 2/27/20 12:26 PM, Leo Famulari wrote:
I'm wondering if I can just push the crates as a single commit, after
inserting them alphabetically and fixing any cosmetic issues, and also
handling the semver-compatible package updates.
I know that we don't usually do this when adding packages to
I agree that auto updaters should be disabled where applicable. But,
ideally, like you said, this should be implemented upstream as a
configuration option we can set at build time.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Ludo,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 00:16, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I’ve reverted it in c2f9ea2b502a617bb69227d5f858eee9d4288a6a, also
> because if was causing a test failure.
I understand and I am fine.
This needs more discussion and polishing.
> The way I see it, it’s on purpose that this
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:26:13PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I'm wondering if I can just push the crates as a single commit, after
> inserting them alphabetically and fixing any cosmetic issues, and also
> handling the semver-compatible package updates.
>
> I know that we don't usually do this
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:16:02PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 09:09:05AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > Short of resorting them I'd start with ones that have no dependencies,
> > just rely on rust-quote & friends or are older versions. Some packages,
> > like
Pjotr Prins writes:
> Anyone got UCSC running with Guix? May be easier than Galaxy which is
> also on the books at some point.
Most of the UCSC browser is non-free software. The kentutils make up a
part of the code. Some of the kentutils are free software and are
available in Guix as the
Hi Giovanni,
> AFAIU UCSC Genome Browser in "just" a browser [1] while Galaxy is a
> "workflow management system" [2] (GWL is missing, and that _is_ the
> solution to the workflow problem space :-) )
>
> Is Galaxy also capable of genome browsing?
Nothing I am aware of. But I am not an real
Hi,
zimoun writes:
> Hi Pjotr,
>
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 19:22, Pjotr Prins wrote:
>
>> Anyone got UCSC running with Guix? May be easier than Galaxy which is
>> also on the books at some point.
Just a curiosity: I'm completely ignorant on this tools but are UCSC
Genome Browser and Galaxy in
10 matches
Mail list logo
