On Wed, Sep 01 2021, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
TL;DR: I'm generally in favor of branching emacs support
packages off, even if origins are to be inherited.
This is my preference, and there is precedent for this in Guix
already. I know of emacs-protobuf-mode and emacs-erlang which are
Am Mittwoch, den 01.09.2021, 19:48 + schrieb Jonathan McHugh:
> September 1, 2021 8:35 PM, "Liliana Marie Prikler" <
> leo.prik...@student.tugraz.at> wrote
>
> > Making our rando commit git versions look like such other distro
> > versions does come at a disadvantage though, particularly when
September 1, 2021 8:35 PM, "Liliana Marie Prikler"
wrote
> Making our rando commit git versions look like such other distro
> versions does come at a disadvantage though, particularly when we look
> at it through the lense of someone not used to Guix' versioning scheme.
> Instead of telling us
Hey Guix!
I just got my phinephone. It's currently running postmarketOS (1). I
usually work nights two nights a week 10pm-6am (EST) Sunday night and
Monday night. If a guix developer would like ssh access to it during
those times, then please let me know. If I should use Mobian instead
to
Hi,
Maxime Devos writes:
>> > have uses outside go-ethereum, so they can be re-used as dependencies of
>> > new go packages, so over time, having to define many new packages when
>> > importing
>> > a go application should become less and less of a problem.
>> >
>> > (About version pinning:
Am Mittwoch, den 01.09.2021, 18:39 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 01-09-2021 om 15:33 [+0200]:
> > Hi
> >
> > Am Dienstag, den 31.08.2021, 23:20 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> > > Sarah Morgensen schreef op di 31-08-2021 om 12:57 [-0700]:
> > > > Hello Guix,
> >
On Wed, Sep 01 2021, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2021, at 06:55, Xinglu Chen wrote:
>> I never felt like including the commit id in the version of a package
>> was useful; e.g., just seeing the first seven characters of the commit
>> id doesn’t really tell me anything about the version.
Attila Lendvai schreef op wo 01-09-2021 om 14:29 [+]:
> On Wednesday, September 1st, 2021 at 00:21, Maxime Devos
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Warning: I haven't actually ever touched a go package. Take my mail
> > with a huge grain of salt.
> > Much of this you've probably already heard at
>
Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 01-09-2021 om 15:33 [+0200]:
> Hi
>
> Am Dienstag, den 31.08.2021, 23:20 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> > Sarah Morgensen schreef op di 31-08-2021 om 12:57 [-0700]:
> > > Hello Guix,
> > >
> > > Currently, there are about 1500 packages defined like this:
> > >
> > (define-public sbcl-feeder
> > (name "sbcl-feeder")
> > (version (extended-version
> > (base "1.0.0")
> > (revision 1)
> > (commit "b05f517d7729564575cc809e086c262646a94d34")))
> > (source
> > (origin
> > (method git-fetch)
> > (uri
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021, at 06:55, Xinglu Chen wrote:
> I never felt like including the commit id in the version of a package
> was useful; e.g., just seeing the first seven characters of the commit
> id doesn’t really tell me anything about the version. I think it is
> more useful to put the date of
On Wednesday, September 1st, 2021 at 00:21, Maxime Devos
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Warning: I haven't actually ever touched a go package. Take my mail
> with a huge grain of salt.
> Much of this you've probably already heard at
> https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2021-08-31.log#024401.
>
> Attila Lendvai
Hi,
On Wed, 01 Sep 2021 at 14:05, Xinglu Chen wrote:
> Cc’ing guix-devel to see what other people think before we start
> breaking people’s setups. :-)
I agree with this Andrew’s comment:
P.S. I know that there are some emacs packages in Guix already, which
doesn't use
Hi
Am Dienstag, den 31.08.2021, 23:20 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Sarah Morgensen schreef op di 31-08-2021 om 12:57 [-0700]:
> > Hello Guix,
> >
> > Currently, there are about 1500 packages defined like this:
> >
> > --8<---cut here---start->8---
> >
Am Mittwoch, den 01.09.2021, 14:05 +0200 schrieb Xinglu Chen:
> > IMO, notmuch package should not include Elisp stuff, at least I
> > don't see use cases, where it can be useful, but see where it can
> > be harmful.
>
> Should this apply to other packages that contains Elisp stuff too, or
> is it
On Tue, Aug 31 2021, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Sarah Morgensen schreef op di 31-08-2021 om 12:57 [-0700]:
>> Hello Guix,
>>
>> Currently, there are about 1500 packages defined like this:
>>
>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> (define-public sbcl-feeder
>> (let
On Wed, Sep 01 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote:
> On 2021-08-30 15:33, Xinglu Chen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 30 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote:
>>
Why would it be more consistent to make a separate package? Making a
separate package is usually used for packaging a slightly different
version of
On Tue, Aug 31 2021, Sarah Morgensen wrote:
> Hello Guix,
>
> Currently, there are about 1500 packages defined like this:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> (define-public sbcl-feeder
> (let ((commit "b05f517d7729564575cc809e086c262646a94d34")
>
crodges schreef op zo 29-08-2021 om 14:53 [-0700]:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Let me start thanking you for developing such a interesting project in GNU
> Guix. Also, I don't want to take up anyone's time, so you can just point to
> documentation or other resource succinctly and I'll do my best. I'm
19 matches
Mail list logo
