Re: avoid wrapper scripts when possible

Hi, Attila Lendvai schreef op di 07-09-2021 om 18:52 [+]: > pardon me for reviving a years old discussion, but i'm facing the same > problem once again. > > i have updated trezor support, and i wanted to test generating a new gpg key: > > $ trezor-gpg init "foobar " > > leading to:

Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?

Maxim Cournoyer writes: > It seems the original issue pointed at was somewhat misguided; is there > still something to be fixed about propagated inputs? It seems the > discussion has moved toward handling propagated inputs for the use of > pkg-config. > > What are the current problems with it,

Re: avoid wrapper scripts when possible

pardon me for reviving a years old discussion, but i'm facing the same problem once again. i have updated trezor support, and i wanted to test generating a new gpg key: $ trezor-gpg init "foobar " leading to: OSError: Cannot find '.trezor-gpg-gpg-agent' in $PATH upstream relies on sys.argv[0]

Python Site Package Syntax Runtime Error

Has anyone come across the following runtime error when running a python-based application in guix? I'm wondering if something went wrong during the package build for python-onlykey-agent that messed up the PYTHONPATH export for the runtime. I should note that python-onlykey-agent is a program

Re: [core-updates-frozen] Bug in binutils 2.37

Leo Famulari skribis: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 03:39:52PM +, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: >> There's a bug in binutils 1.37, which we are using on the >> core-updates-frozen branch. > > 2.37, right? :) > Indeed. :) >> It's a file descriptor leak that can lead to 'malformed archive'

Re: [core-updates-frozen] Bug in binutils 1.37

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 03:39:52PM +, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: > There's a bug in binutils 1.37, which we are using on the > core-updates-frozen branch. 2.37, right? :) > It's a file descriptor leak that can lead to 'malformed archive' errors > when linking libraries. We get this problem

Re: PEP 668 -- Graceful cooperation between external and Python package managers

On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 04:39:28PM +0200, Maxime Devos wrote: > See . > I haven't looked closely into this myself. > It might be relevant to Guix. > > For LWN subscribers, there is an article about the PEP: > . Here is

PEP 668 -- Graceful cooperation between external and Python package managers

See . I haven't looked closely into this myself. It might be relevant to Guix. For LWN subscribers, there is an article about the PEP: . Greetings, Maxime. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?

Hello, good plan! Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > At this point the question then becomes what to name this "build" > output and what to put into it besides pkg-config stuff. In Debian, it's a "dev" package, includes .h (C headers), .pc, .a (static libraries). > Particularly in the land of

Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?

Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op zo 05-09-2021 om 23:10 [+0200]: > Am Sonntag, den 05.09.2021, 22:27 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos: > > Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op zo 05-09-2021 om 21:37 [+0200]: > > > > > I must admit that this solution appears to have some surface > > > > > elegance, but what