Re: How did you handle making a GNU/Linux distribution?

2021-09-12 Thread Christine Lemmer-Webber
Philip McGrath writes: > Hi Sage, > > On 8/22/21 5:53 PM, Sage Gerard wrote: >> Thanks for the detailed answer! >> It seems wise to adapt GNU Mes towards Racket or Chez Scheme instead >> of >> Guile to bring GNU's benefits to more Scheme and Racket programmers. Has >> someone already tried

Re: Named environments

2021-09-12 Thread Sarah Morgensen
Ryan Prior writes: > Hey Guix. > > I've been thinking lately it would be convenient to create certain uniquely > named execution environments on my machine. For example, I might have one > set up with dependencies for my Python webapp & environment variables set to > autoconnect to a Postgres

Re: Batching world-rebuilding changes for the core-updates-frozen branch

2021-09-12 Thread Sarah Morgensen
Hi, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hello Guix! > > Since there's going to be at least this change [0] causing a world > rebuild of the core-updates-frozen branch, I'd like to know if there are > other world-rebuilding but low-risk changes you'd like to see integrated > into the branch. Perhaps we

Re: Duplicated libxml++ packages

2021-09-12 Thread Guillaume Le Vaillant
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > Guillaume Le Vaillant 写道: >> I just noticed on the core-updates-frozen branch that there are libxml++ >> packages (in gnome.scm) and also libxmlplusplus packages (in xml.scm). >> I checked the sources of libxml++-2.40.1 and libxmlplusplus-2.40.1, and >> it looks

Re: Duplicated libxml++ packages

2021-09-12 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Guillaume Le Vaillant 写道: I just noticed on the core-updates-frozen branch that there are libxml++ packages (in gnome.scm) and also libxmlplusplus packages (in xml.scm). I checked the sources of libxml++-2.40.1 and libxmlplusplus-2.40.1, and it looks like it is the same library. Good catch;

Re: PEP 668 -- Graceful cooperation between external and Python package managers

2021-09-12 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Hi, Am Samstag, den 11.09.2021, 22:36 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > IIUC, PEP 668 is about *warning* a pip user when installing a package > would shadow a system one; it does so by reading a EXTERNALLY-MANAGED > file in the Python library site-packages directory. > > So simply put, all we

Duplicated libxml++ packages

2021-09-12 Thread Guillaume Le Vaillant
I just noticed on the core-updates-frozen branch that there are libxml++ packages (in gnome.scm) and also libxmlplusplus packages (in xml.scm). I checked the sources of libxml++-2.40.1 and libxmlplusplus-2.40.1, and it looks like it is the same library. I think we could keep only the

Re: eudev deprecation

2021-09-12 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
One more & I'll stop the spam: https://pad.dyne.org/pad/#/2/pad/edit/ngCNROttei-mn3BnW3O1KHdG/ Kind regards, T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: eudev deprecation

2021-09-12 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
…and for completeness: a certain distro has a nascent Libera IRC channel with topic ‘let's keep eudev maintained’: http://reisenweber.net/irclogs/freenode/_devuan-eudev/ Perhaps it will become useful to us. Kind regards, T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: eudev deprecation

2021-09-12 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Lars-Dominik Braun 写道: Looking at Gentoo’s ebuilds it should be possible to “extract” and build udev from systemd’s sources. That's my understanding as well, but I haven't tried :o) For easy reference, here's the link:

eudev deprecation

2021-09-12 Thread Lars-Dominik Braun
Hi everyone, it looks like eudev, which we heavily rely on, is dead upstream: https://github.com/gentoo/eudev/issues/199 Looking at Gentoo’s ebuilds it should be possible to “extract” and build udev from systemd’s sources. Cheers, Lars

Re: Batching world-rebuilding changes for the core-updates-frozen branch

2021-09-12 Thread Attila Lendvai
not sure this is relevant here, but there is this fix for wrap-script, too: http://issues.guix.gnu.org/40039 Sent from mobile, pardon my brevity. Original Message On Sep 8, 2021, 17:00, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hello Guix! > > Since there's going to be at least this change