Hi Leo,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 22:02, Leo Famulari wrote:
> It's caused by $GUIX_DOWNLOAD_FALLBACK_TEST=none
Oh, indeed! Nothing weird in fact. :-) The derivations are different
(the way to compute) but the outputs are the same; recursively.
Fun! :-)
Thanks for this non obvious at first
Hi Ricardo,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 13:10, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> The build phases that patch out these features would have to check
> for that build system option, much like they check the TESTS?
> option before attempting to run tests.
Then it could be a transformation. The idea sounds
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 03:13, zimoun wrote:
> I am currently rebuilding all the julia-* packages. It is high probable
> some are now broken. But it appears to me not a blocker for the
> merge.
All is fixed in patch#52117 [1]. After this hacking session,
1. The package julia uses
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 22:01, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Thank you for the invitation!
Cool! I say each time to my self: next I will attend… and life happens.
Anyway, next time I will be there. :-)
(Off-topic ramblings…
> Threading is (or should be) based on message IDs, although
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 22:01:32 +0100 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Hi jgart,
>
> Thank you for the invitation!
>
> jgart 写道：
> > Not sure what to do at this point.
>
> At this point, not much: you might reply to the mail with a
> non-empty subject, and hope that people will reply to that one,
Hi jgart,
Thank you for the invitation!
jgart 写道：
Not sure what to do at this point.
At this point, not much: you might reply to the mail with a
non-empty subject, and hope that people will reply to that one, or
that they will manually copy it when replying to your original
post. Others
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 06:11:50 -0500 jgart wrote:
> Hi Guixers!
>
> I'd like to invite you to another Guix packaging meetup this Saturday,
> November 27 at 2PM ET (19:00 UTC).
>
> Let's try Big Blue Button provided by nixnet.services this time. It has a
> fancy whiteboard!
>
>
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice ,
Leo Famulari ,
Ryan Prior ,
BonfaceKilz ,
Pjotr Prins ,
Yasuaki Kudo ,
Raghav Gururajan ,
Guillaume Le Vaillant ,
Pierre Neidhardt ,
Arun Isaac ,
Kevin Herald Reierskog
Subject: Guix Packaging Meetup Saturday Nov 27 2PM ET (19:00 UTC)
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To:
Hi Guixers!
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 04:03, Jacob Hrbek wrote:
> My theory is designed with tolerance of <5 min with max tolerance of
> =10 min with methods that I am confident will get us within <30 sec
> assuming sufficient amount of data to construct the variables.
Please back this claims with
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 20:55, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I'm seeing something weird, where Guix is creating different derivations
> based on the same Git commit, between two machines of the same system
> type:
Euh?!
Many things appear really weird. Just, how is it possible,
>
Hi,
I am not able to find in guix-devel archives this email with the
Message-ID 874k8xrn49@ngyro.com. Below the complete header.
Do I miss something?
Cheers,
simon
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 at 15:49, Timothy Sample wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Here’s a new version of the Preservation of Guix Report:
I am trying to package "Speedometer" [1]. This is the package
definition:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
(define-public speedometer
(package
(name "speedometer")
(version "2.8")
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri (pypi-uri
12 matches
Mail list logo
