Ludovic Courtès writes:
The disk space usage trend is pretty much
linear, so if things continue without any change, I think it
will be
necessary to pause the agents within a month, to avoid filling
up
bayfront entirely.
Ah, bummer. I hope we can find a solution one way or another.
Ekaitz Zarraga writes:
Maybe “TARGET NOT found” is CMake’s original way of saying that
you’re
missing a dependency (libsquashfuse), no?
I mean, I already reached that conclusion but if you check the
packages in the
original message, the dependency is included. I can't find why
isn't it
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Hi,
zimoun skribis:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 13:10, Ricardo Wurmus
wrote:
The build phases that patch out these features would have to
check
for that build system option, much like they check the TESTS?
option before attempting to run tests.
Then it could be
Ludovic Courtès writes:
We could try that, but IMO we first need a solution within
days—we just
cannot reasonably let this branch go on for longer than that.
The
librsvg 2.40 hack would give us Xfce (maybe GNOME?) on i686
today.
Perhaps we can address all this in several steps:
1.
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
> I'd like to revise my position, as I got confirmation that it ought to
> be possible to cross-build rustc for other architectures from our
> (cleanly bootstrapped) x86_64 rustc!
[...]
> I haven't yet done any reading, but if Mutabah (the author of mrustc)
> says
> Hi,
>
> The log reads:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> -- Found PkgConfig:
> /gnu/store/krpyb0zi700dcrg9cc8932w4v0qivdg9-pkg-config-0.29.2/bin/pkg-config
> (found version "0.29.2")
> -- Importing target libfuse via pkg-config (fuse, shared)
> -- Checking
Hi!
zimoun skribis:
> Oh, indeed! Nothing weird in fact. :-) The derivations are different
> (the way to compute) but the outputs are the same; recursively.
Lesson: always compare the output file names in the .drv files before
digging further. (I made that mistake a number of times!)
Ludo’.
Hi,
zimoun skribis:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 13:10, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
>> The build phases that patch out these features would have to check
>> for that build system option, much like they check the TESTS?
>> option before attempting to run tests.
>
> Then it could be a transformation.
Hi,
The log reads:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
-- Found PkgConfig:
/gnu/store/krpyb0zi700dcrg9cc8932w4v0qivdg9-pkg-config-0.29.2/bin/pkg-config
(found version "0.29.2")
-- Importing target libfuse via pkg-config (fuse, shared)
-- Checking for module
Hello,
Christopher Baines skribis:
> I've been doing some performance tuning, submitting builds is now more
> parallelised, a source of slowness when fetching builds has been
> addressed, and one of the long queries involved in allocating builds has
> been removed, which also improved handling
Hi Tobias!
guix-comm...@gnu.org skribis:
> --- a/nix/libstore/local-store.cc
> +++ b/nix/libstore/local-store.cc
> @@ -839,7 +839,8 @@ template T
> LocalStore::getIntLineFromSubstituter(Agent & run)
> {
> string s = getLineFromSubstituter(run);
> T res;
> -if (!string2Int(s,
Tobias Platen writes:
On Sat, 2021-11-27 at 19:43 -0800, John Soo wrote:
Hi Guix,
I had the same thought as Maxim. In my quest for arm support
for ghc,
I thought about using a cross-compiled version. Is this
possible or
even desirable? I think for rust and ghc it would be very
helpful
12 matches
Mail list logo
