Am Freitag, dem 18.02.2022 um 01:10 + schrieb Zelphir Kaltstahl:
> [...]
>
> Since there was some verification thing with the `guix gc --
> verify=contents` command, I will run `guix gc`, delete the whole guix
> profile, recreate the profile, and then check again.
>
>
> $ guix gc
> ...
Hello,
On 2/17/22 18:49, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, dem 16.02.2022 um 22:23 + schrieb Zelphir Kaltstahl:
[...]
It is t. That is after loading `init.el` and all it contains, but
there is no magit configuration happening inside this `init.el` yet.
Now I'm at the end of
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 16.02.2022 um 22:23 + schrieb Zelphir Kaltstahl:
>> [...]
>> It is t. That is after loading `init.el` and all it contains, but
>> there is no magit configuration happening inside this `init.el` yet.
> Now I'm at the end of words.
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, dem 16.02.2022 um 22:23 + schrieb Zelphir Kaltstahl:
> [...]
> It is t. That is after loading `init.el` and all it contains, but
> there is no magit configuration happening inside this `init.el` yet.
Now I'm at the end of words. Using my own machine as source of truth,
Hi Simon,
> We are far from OpenBLAS. :-)
That's fine with me. The more distance between me and OpenBLAS, the
happier I am ;-)
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 14:04, Konrad Hinsen
> wrote:
>
>> Making scientific computations bit-for-bit reproducible is the moral
>> equivalent of keeping a detailed
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:28 PM Greg Hogan wrote:
> I then saw the error building binutils-mesboot0 as in bug #41264, for
> which Mathieu proposed an idea for fixing Mes, still awaiting
> implementation.
>
> As a temporary fix the same tmpfs trick works when bind mounting /gnu and
> /var/guix
Hi Konrad,
We agree on the main points in the scope of Guix. :-) We probably
disagree on some specific points about epistemology or epistemic
justification; I am not sure to understand enough these terms to put
them here. :-)
We are far from OpenBLAS. :-)
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 14:04, Konrad
