Re: Merging the purge-python2-packages branch

Hi Maxim, Thanks for this janitor work. :-) On Tue, 31 May 2022 at 15:07, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> Well, as a hobbyist, I am fine with such purge. As a scientific >> practitioner using Guix at work, it is more annoying… > > Agreed. My understanding is that scientists making use of Guix

Re: Merging the purge-python2-packages branch

Hi Simon, zimoun writes: [...] > BTW, ’python2-biopython’ is broken in the branch > ’purge-python2-packages’ and still there [1]. > > 1: Thanks. It's now gone along pplacer-scripts and pplacer, which were using it as an input. >> This effort is

Re: antioxidant-build-system can be tested as a channel, + > GTK app 'castor' builds

kias...@disroot.org schreef op di 31-05-2022 om 17:45 [+]: > Hi Maxime, > > > > > Non-goals: > > > > * Produce exactly the same binaries with exactly the same dependencies as > > with > > Cargo. If you want to reproduce a binary produced with Cargo, use Cargo. > > > > If I compile

Re: Finding a “good” OpenPGP key server

Hi, On mar., 31 mai 2022 at 08:09, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Or keep some keyrings in a git repo, if we want to keep the keys > somewhat restricted to committers... a major problem of the public > keyserver network is/was the ability for anyone to update or add any key > for anybody. > > We've

Re: antioxidant-build-system can be tested as a channel, + > GTK app 'castor' builds

Hi Maxime, > > Non-goals: > > * Produce exactly the same binaries with exactly the same dependencies as with > Cargo. If you want to reproduce a binary produced with Cargo, use Cargo. > If I compile project P to produce binary A (with antioxidant) and binary C (with Cargo), will A and C have

Re: Finding a “good” OpenPGP key server

On 2022-05-30, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Maxime Devos skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 18-04-2022 om 22:24 [+0200]: >>> [... guix refresh -u stuff failing due to not finding the key ...] >>> I’m not sure what a good solution is (other than looking for the key >>> manually on Savannah or

Re: antioxidant-build-system can be tested as a channel, + GTK app 'castor' builds

Maxime Devos schreef op di 31-05-2022 om 11:27 [+0200]: > (d) Implement support for "cdylib" such that things like librsvg can > be built. Some basic support now implemented in 7040ce32840ba74f948fe9d243e1eb393daec4fc, though probably more remains to be done for librsvg. signature.asc

Re: Faster "guix pull" by incremental compilation and non-circular modules?

Maxime Devos writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Gábor Boskovits schreef op di 31-05-2022 om 06:54 [+0200]: >> I was thinking about a bit of a different structure that can also be >> automated. My original idea was to use the already existing tree >> structure of the derivations, and

Re: antioxidant-build-system can be tested as a channel, + GTK app 'castor' builds

Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 30-05-2022 om 17:26 [+0200]: [...] To make sure share a common understanding, could you post a summary of:   1. the goals;   2. the status;   3. pros and cons over the status quo and other options (if any!);   4. the next steps. > [...] (notabug.org is down, so I've

Re: Faster "guix pull" by incremental compilation and non-circular modules?

Gábor Boskovits schreef op di 31-05-2022 om 06:54 [+0200]: > I was thinking about a bit of a different structure that can also be > automated. My original idea was to use the already existing tree > structure of the derivations, and split it based on depth. I think > that gives a bit more

Re: Finding a “good” OpenPGP key server

Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 30-05-2022 om 17:34 [+0200]: > > (package > >    (name "gnurl") > >    [...] > >    (properties > > ;; Keys that are considered ‘trustworthy’ for signing releases > > ;; of gnurl. > > `((permitted-pgp-signing-keys "CABB A99E ..." "DEAD BEEF ...") > >    

Re: Finding a “good” OpenPGP key server

Hi Ludo’, Quoting Ludovic Courtès (2022-05-30 17:34:43) > Maxime Devos skribis: > > > Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 18-04-2022 om 22:24 [+0200]: > >> [... guix refresh -u stuff failing due to not finding the key ...] > >> I’m not sure what a good solution is (other than looking for the key >

Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hopefully we’ll get a clearer picture in the coming days… There is starting to be some information in the QA data service instance:

Re: Merging the purge-python2-packages branch

On 5/30/22 18:49, zimoun wrote: Well, me, personally, I continue to do most of my research using Python 2 because I cannot afford to port everything to Python 3. And since I do only number crunching, meaning nothing with security implications, I am not