python-libcst upgrade and python-flake8

2022-06-09 Thread jgart
Hi Guixers, What do suggest as a recommended fix for this error? ``` = 482 passed in 3.80s == phase `check' succeeded after 5.0 seconds starting phase `sanity-check' validating 'flake8'

Re: Teams

2022-06-09 Thread Arun Isaac
Hi Guix, I like the idea of teams. And, it's nice to see so many volunteers raise their hands! > * Rust team > Efraim Flashner > Aleksandr Vityazev > Arun Isaac > John Soo > Maxim Cournoyer > Nicolas Goaziou > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice However, I know very little about Rust, and I'm not a good

Re: Merging ‘staging’?

2022-06-09 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 08:41:21PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > I know I've built llvm@11 and mesa on aarch64 hardware for staging. Oh I see I'm missing the last merge; I'm still at commit b422687cbd. I will try again with staging at 091eb323ba27. But it will take a long time; feel free to

Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy

2022-06-09 Thread Arun Isaac
Hi Ludo, > I can think of two ways to reassure committers: > > 1. By having clear reviewer check lists (you’d do that if you tick all > the boxes, you’re fine); > > 2. By improving automation—nothing new here: if there was a tick that > says “applies without merge conflicts” and

Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy

2022-06-09 Thread Arun Isaac
Hi Giovanni, >> Guix has very high coding standards > > Do you think other software distribution do have less high coding > standards? I meant that Guix has very high coding/packaging standards in the following senses: - We prefer to not bundle dependencies. Tracking out bundled

Re: Merging ‘staging’?

2022-06-09 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 07:19:30PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 11:17:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > We have to check for AArch64 & co. Any takers? > > > > Overall it seems to me we should be able to merge ‘staging’ within a > > couple of days.

Re: Merging ‘staging’?

2022-06-09 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 11:17:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > We have to check for AArch64 & co. Any takers? > > Overall it seems to me we should be able to merge ‘staging’ within a > couple of days. Thoughts? > > Ludo’. > I mostly succeeded in updating my rock64 aarch64 machine guix

Re: aarch64 workers appear to have stalled on ci.guix.gnu.org

2022-06-09 Thread Greg Hogan
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:59 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > It looks like ‘cuirass-remote-worker’ needed a kick on these boxes, > which Mathieu and I did earlier today (‘herd restart …’). Most of them > are busy right now. I only count 7 successful builds for aarch64, and several more under

Re: proposal: guix-ment...@gnu.org list/alias

2022-06-09 Thread Paul Jewell
On 03/06/2022 12:53, jbra...@dismail.de wrote: I always use this website to remind myself how to use git send-email: https://git-send-email.io/ We could out that information in the guix manual or link to it. :) This is great - many thanks for sharing. I think a link in the manual would be

Re: Repology and outdated packages

2022-06-09 Thread Maxime Devos
Maxime Devos schreef op di 07-06-2022 om 23:32 [+0200]: > In my experience with antioxidant, not-up-to-date Rust toolchains do > not prevent upgrading packages -- in the process of resolving build > failures, I updated some crates.  This never resulted in a ‘you need > an > new toolchain error’.