Re: Golang check phase skipping some tests?

Hi Sharlatan, Sharlatan Hellseher writes: > Hi Maxim, > > Thank you for detailed replay. > >> The branch workflow for teams is to use a *-team branch that is short >> lived, e.g. for the time needed to do the integration work; with an >> associated job spec in Cuirass (ci.guix.gnu.org) to build

Re: Guix CLI, thoughts and suggestions

Hi Ian, On Sat, Jan 20 2024, Ian Eure wrote: > I agree that this would make sense, but my understanding is that `guix > package' doesn’t work like that -- it only performs the final > operation in the list. IMO, it should either do *everything* the > commands specify, or print an error and take

Re: [core-updates] Native build of make-boot0 fails on missing zstd

Hello, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: [...] > As mentioned on IRC, this fixes it for me; thanks! Great! I'm tentatively including many other patches I had lined up for the next world rebuild that I've picked from guix-patches, to turn this wasted computing cycles into an opportunity. --

Re: [core-updates] Native build of make-boot0 fails on missing zstd

Maxim Cournoyer writes: Hi Maxim, > Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: > >> Maxim Cournoyer writes: >> >> Hi, >> >>> Efraim Flashner writes: >>> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:33:37AM +0100, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > My previous diff included yet another bug... here's one that seems to >

Re: [core-updates] Native build of make-boot0 fails on missing zstd

Hi Janneke, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > > Hi, > >> Efraim Flashner writes: >> >>> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:33:37AM +0100, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Hi! On core-updates, running ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i586-gnu -e '(@@

Re: [core-updates] Native build of make-boot0 fails on missing zstd

Maxim Cournoyer writes: Hi, > Efraim Flashner writes: > >> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:33:37AM +0100, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> On core-updates, running >>> >>> ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i586-gnu -e '(@@ (gnu packages >>> commencement) gnu-make-boot0)' >>> >>>

Re: [shepherd] several patches that i deem ready

Hi Attila, Attila Lendvai writes: >> - a lightweight logging infrastructure together with plenty of log >> lines throughout the codebase, and some hints in the README on how >> to turn log lines gray in emacs (i.e. easily ignorable). Are you using guile-lib's logging library for it? I've used

Re: [core-updates] Native build of make-boot0 fails on missing zstd

Hello, Efraim Flashner writes: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:33:37AM +0100, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On core-updates, running >> >> ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i586-gnu -e '(@@ (gnu packages >> commencement) gnu-make-boot0)' >> >> fails for me with >> >> sh:

Re: [core-updates] Native build of make-boot0 fails on missing zstd

On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:33:37AM +0100, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Hi! > > On core-updates, running > > ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i586-gnu -e '(@@ (gnu packages > commencement) gnu-make-boot0)' > > fails for me with > > sh: zstd: command not found > > See log below.

Re: [shepherd] several patches that i deem ready

> - a lightweight logging infrastructure together with plenty of log > lines throughout the codebase, and some hints in the README on how > to turn log lines gray in emacs (i.e. easily ignorable). a quick note on the log statements: they are essentially noise when it comes to reading the code,

[core-updates] Native build of make-boot0 fails on missing zstd

Hi! On core-updates, running ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i586-gnu -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) gnu-make-boot0)' fails for me with sh: zstd: command not found See log below. FWIW, using --system=i686-linux for example, works fine. To be able to run this, you'll have to