Hi Felipe,
On Wed, Mar 06 2024, Luis Felipe wrote:
> That page also mentions the reasoning behind the derivative logo.
Absolutely gorgeous! I like A1, although in a fit of disrespect I might
have placed the horns upside down like a scorpion...
Great work. The project is very lucky to have you!
Hi,
A reminder that the first patch review session is happening tomorrow, Thursday
7th March.
Who knows how many people will be there, or what level of experience everyone
will have. We'll be learning what works as we try out these sessions.
Hopefully, Andreas Enge with his 'committer' hat on
On 2024-03-06, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> I don’t feel qualified to judge, but is this the preference? Arch wiki
> advises against the Arch AUR package: “Therefore, after updating Guix
> once, the AUR advantage really turns into a disadvantage, as there will
> be many unnecessary files
Suhail Singh writes:
> FWIW, as an openSUSE Tumbleweed user, I believe Tumbleweed users who
> don't care if there is an easy way to uninstall Guix would be better
> served by using =guix-install.sh= as opposed to =zypper=.
Btw, for completeness, on Tumbleweed, the user needs to take some
Matt writes:
> I wonder if we should have similar concerns about the Debian and
> openSUSE packages?
FWIW, as an openSUSE Tumbleweed user, I believe Tumbleweed users who
don't care if there is an easy way to uninstall Guix would be better
served by using =guix-install.sh= as opposed to
On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 18:15:05 +0100 pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote ---
> Thank you Matt for the suggested diff.
Thank you for taking the time to review it!
> > - Places directions for 'guix-install.sh' after directions to use
> > distribution-specific package managers, giving
On Wednesday, March 6th, 2024 at 11:37 AM, Luis Felipe
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Nonguix would like to have a logo [...] I couldn't help it and suggested to
> reuse the GNU Guix logo
I like this. There's a clear visual continuity, but with warnings and (in
options B-D) part of the Guix horns
Hi,
Nonguix would like to have a logo. @jonsger contacted me asking if I'd
be interested in helping them with that, based on logo ideas from the
community. I don't use nonguix myself, so I thought I wouldn't have the
motivation to design a logo. But I couldn't help it and suggested to
reuse
All versions of Emacs except emacs-minimal are built with tree-sitter
support. But no grammar is added to propagated-inputs. Emacs version
29.1 ships with the following major modes:
typescript-ts-mode
c-ts-mode
c++-ts-mode
java-ts-mode
python-ts-mode
css-ts-mode
json-ts-mode
csharp-ts-mode
Thank you Matt for the suggested diff.
Yes, I agree some simplification as you suggested would be beneficial,
so that the description of Binary Installation looks as simple as it
really is. (In particular, I have witnessed people, to whom I had
suggested Guix, fail at trying Guix because they
On 2024-03-06 11:36:29 +, Etienne B. Roesch wrote:
> That's the link I have https://meet.jit.si/london-guix-meetup
Great, thank you very much, looking forward to tomorrow. :)
Tomas
--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one
That's the link I have https://meet.jit.si/london-guix-meetup
Etienne
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 11:28 AM Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2024-03-06 10:40:14 +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> >
> > Looking forward to tomorrow,
> >
>
> I would just like to point out that the link to the
Hi,
On 2024-03-06 10:40:14 +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
>
> Looking forward to tomorrow,
>
I would just like to point out that the link to the jitsi meeting is not on the
wiki page and was not shared here neither (for those of us who have issues with
meetup.com). I think it was said before the
Hi Ludio,
I'd like to get some advice:
In commit 84c3aafb5a18ad278bbb36df7b70849fe05789c8 "trytond:
Avoid top-level references to other modules" your turned a
top-level variable which defines into a thunk:
-(define
Hello,
Am Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:19:46PM + schrieb Etienne B. Roesch:
> Anything we need to have prepared by Thursday?
> I imagine a ubuntu vm running with vanilla guix installed is installed?
you should have a means of running Guix, and so that your store gets
populated with recent basic
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 09:24:29PM -0500, Jason Conroy wrote:
> Hello Efraim,
>
> Thanks for investigating this - a Rust development workflow using only
> Guix-native crates is something I've been waiting for!
>
> I was experimenting with your patches and it seems that they do pull in the
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
