Re: [bug-womb] Texinfo markup in package blurbs

Hi Ludovic, > Guix has gained the possibility to have Texinfo markup in package > descriptions¹, which is properly rendered by user interfaces and at > .  Often we just limit > ourselves to ornaments such as @dfn, @code, or @uref. > > Perhaps we could

Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs

Hi everyone, On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 13:44 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Actually I see that GSRC already maintains per-package keyrings. > > How is this maintained, Brandon? That is, where do you get information > on which keys to put in the keyring, etc.? Admittedly, it's not ideal. When

Re: [bug-gsrc] Checking signatures on source tarballs

On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 09:37 +0100, Brandon Invergo wrote: > I could swear that previously a keyring of the GNU maintainers was > made available by the FSF somewhere but I cannot find it. http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-keyring.gpg Of course, this doesn't help for those GNU packages that are no

Re: [bug-gsrc] Checking signatures on source tarballs

On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 18:38 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > However, this package → keys mapping necessarily exists somewhere.  I > think we should ask the FSF to publish it and provide a way to > authenticate it. > > WDYT? If they would be willing to publish it, I think it would be a very good

Re: [bug-gsrc] Checking signatures on source tarballs

On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 23:34 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > We would need the help and support of someone from the GNU Advisory > Committee, I guess… > > :-) OK I think I know just the guy for the job. :) I'll start the discussion.  Feel free to ping me to check on the progress! -brandon

Re: Guix != GNU GSD == True

suggestions? Or am I talking nonsense? -brandon -- Brandon Invergo http://brandon.invergo.net

Re: Python 3 binaries

written in python3 but the shebang is for /usr/bin/python. -brandon -- Brandon Invergo http://brandon.invergo.net pgpReWjPHwLzn.pgp Description: PGP signature