Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?

Ekaitz Zarraga writes: >> > This is what I mean when I say many times emacs is kind of mandatory, >> > and >> > this thread is kind of a demonstration of what I meant because the main >> > discussion evolved to: you can use this or that in emacs to ease the >> > dev >> > experience. >> >> >>

Re: Relaxing the restrictions for store item names

Nguyễn Gia Phong writes: > On 2023-08-24 at 10:16+03:00, MSavoritias wrote: >> "(" writes: >> > Eidvilas Markevičius writes: >> > > with a name that contains non-Latin characters in it >> > > (e.g., "Naršytuvas" by Raštija [2]). >> > >> > I think we should stick to ASCII characters in

Re: Maybe a way to get a few more developpers to work on Guix ?

pinoaffe writes: > Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." > writes: >> ... code generation through LLMs. This could itself help Guix generate >> (and fix) package definitions. > > I really don't think that that'd be a good match for Guix. Writing >