Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> writes:
> Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org> writes:
>
>> Hmm, that mail went out a bit too rushed.
>>
>> I updated jemalloc to a newer version so it supports the sdallocx calls.
>> I have not yet tested them with the ot
* gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm (jemalloc): Update to 4.2.0.
---
gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm b/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm
index 52d43e8..e82bcd8 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm
+++
Hmm, that mail went out a bit too rushed.
I updated jemalloc to a newer version so it supports the sdallocx calls.
I have not yet tested them with the other packages that depend on it
(mariadb, blender)
Regards,
Jelle
2016-05-04 12:51 GMT+02:00 Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org>:
> Dat
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 00:09:41 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 24.5.1
* gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-estimability): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm b/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm
I have taken the liberty to try my hand at finishing this, as I figured
it would be a good way for me to get more familiar with 'the Guix way'
of packaging things.
Wow, did I misjudge this rabbit hole though. It seems to be the case that
rust needs the (most recent) snapshotted binary stage-0
According to that definition, beta does not seem to be a monniker we should
be using on the website then either ;-).
Either way, it would be nice to apply these terms consistently.
Jelle
On Apr 5, 2016 3:30 PM, "Florian Paul Schmidt" <mista.ta...@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 05.0
cd6c615708d23226d4b90c256cfcef49ec9ee275 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:04:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ui: Updated installation motd alpha reference to beta
* gnu/system/install.scm (installation-services): Refer to GuixSD as beta
software in motd
--
2016-03-27 0:26 GMT+01:00 Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name>:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 11:53:24PM +0100, Jelle Licht wrote:
> > From jq's README:
> >
> > To get regexp support you'll also need to install Oniguruma (note that
> jq's
> > > tests require
.
What is the 'guix' way of handling these cases?
--
Jelle
2016-03-26 23:45 GMT+01:00 Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name>:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 11:06:15PM +0100, Jelle Licht wrote:
> > +(inputs
> > + `(("oniguruma" ,oniguruma)))
>
> [...]
>
> > +
impler than you’d expect.
>
> Hope that helps!
> --
> Alex Griffin
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Jelle Licht wrote:
> > ... and the actual package I wanted to use on guix!
> > Email had 1 attachment:
>
>
> > * 0002-gnu-Add-jq.patch
> > 3k
... and the actual package I wanted to use on guix!
From 83cfc9414fca3ab57c949e18c1ceb375a179b59c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:31:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add jq
* gnu/packages/web.scm (jq): New variable
---
gnu/packages/w
2001
From: Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:28:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add oniguruma
* gnu/packages/textutils.scm (oniguruma): New variable
---
gnu/packages/textutils.scm | 21 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/pa
Thanks for the feedback.
You are correct in your interpretation of my description. Some packages only
publish a blob, and while this should eventually also be handled
gracefully, a
first working version of an importer would surely be easier to realize if we
focus on the more well-behaved packages
Hello Guix,
Seeing as this time next year I'll be finishing up my studies, this was a
now-or-never moment for me. I would love to spend this summer hacking on
both guix, and reading up on npm.
Attached you will find the .org and corresponding pdf export of my draft
proposal for GSoC 2016!
If
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo