Occasionally one makes mistakes. On this occasion I have made an
enormous one. I hope this post will go some small way to put it
right and explain how it came about. I don't seek to excuse anything
I said or did.
The entire ugly thread started last week when I replied to this
message from
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:17:08PM +, ng0 wrote:
Word of advice: don't use 'transvestite'. It's a slur.
Is it? I didn't know that. I thought it just came from the latin,
(or greek or whatever): trans meaning "across" and "vestment" clothing.
It certainly wasn't a slur when I first
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:29:05PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
Hi John,
thanks for looking into the problem.
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 02:22:11 +0100
John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> wrote:
> + (arguments `(#:configure-flags '("LDF
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:14:45AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
I'm trying to draw this thread to a close as I genuinely believe that
neither side intends malice:
- John genuinely does not see how his statements can very easily be
interpreted as highly disrespectful
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:09:28AM +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 02:22:11 +0100
John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> wrote:
> --- a/gnu/packages/image.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/image.scm
> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@
>
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 02:41:09PM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
No, normally gschemas.compiled is one file storing information about all
GSettings application. It must thus be created from files provided by
multiple packages.
For example, gnome-calculator
This patch fixes a number of failures in core-updates. I don't know
if there is a better way of doing it, or why it is suddenly necessary.
gnu: Add LDFLAGS=-lpthread to configure-flags where needed.
* gnu/packages/fontutils.scm (arguments)[configure-flags]: Add LDFLAGS=lpthread.
* gnu/packages/image.scm (arguments)[configure-flags]: Add LDFLAGS=lpthread.
---
gnu/packages/fontutils.scm | 1 +
gnu/packages/image.scm | 2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:49:13PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John, people have explained things at length already; you can re-read
the project???s code of conduct if in doubt. This isn???t up for debate.
Please stop playing this game right now.
Ludo,
* I am not
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:09:33AM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
John Darrington writes:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 07:57:07PM -0700, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote:
> ... and yes. If an individual specifically requests to be referred to by
> a part
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:27:48PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Howdy!
John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> skribis:
> As I recall, their request was that I always use "singular they" and
never to
> mention other possible alte
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:05:11PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
You don't need any additional "plugins" for this, as Emacs couldn't miss
it!
To check it, run "emacs -Q", paste this:
(source (origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri (string-append
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:53:38PM +0100, Pjotr Prins wrote:
Erm. Despite the obvious intelligence of all Guix participants I think
we ought to stick to technical issues on this mailing list (i.e.,
guix-technical).
Maybe we can fork these recent discussions to
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:21:59PM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
My intention was to call-back to my impression of other parts of this
conversation where it seemed you were point-blank refusing to
acknowledge ng0's request.
As I recall, their request was that I always use
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:17:28AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
Perhaps we have to agree to disagree on singular they, but I hope we can
still agree on the following statements from my earlier email:
I agree to a slightly edited version:
-
[...]
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:57:04AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
>
> ... and yes. If an individual specifically requests to be referred to by
> a partcular set of pronouns I will attempt to do so, but may occasionally
> forget if that person wants feminine pronouns and is
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:18:39AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:03:03AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> > +(source (origin
> > + (method url-fetch)
> > + (uri (string-append
"mirror:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 08:47:17AM -0700, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote:
Are there any guidelines as to what parts of English one should avoid
using in documentation?
There are some such guidlines. See:
https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Documentation
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 05:00:55PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Hi John,
> So if there is going to be a joint effort at this I suggest that somehow
we
> decide in advance which packages are done by whom.
>
> I'm not sure how best to divide them up, since the lower
The problem as I understand it is as follows:
Two (or more) packages both contain a file: /gnu/store/.../xyz/foo
So long as those two packages are not both installed into the same profile at
the same time, this is not a problem. However if the user chooses to
install both packages
Hello Florian,
I agree that this is a problem. It has been discussed before, and various
solutions have been suggested, but I don't think install hooks was one of
them.
Can you elaborate on your idea? What would an install hook do, and how would
it work?
J'
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 08:20:32PM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
Here is a work-in-progress set of package definitions, the packages are
upgraded to their latest version, except for:
- pjproject(-sfl) :: Which I upgraded to 2.5.5 so as to respect the
[CC guix-devel@gnu.org]
So we have to make a choice:
1. Package a released program with a known vulnerability; or
2. Package an unreleased git snapshot.
Which is the lesser evil?
J'
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 12:21:40PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:13:25PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Hi Hartmut,
Hartmut Goebel skribis:
> as promised earlier, I prepared a repository inclusing patches for more
> than 300 KDE packages. I will not have time to work on
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:52:16AM +, ng0 wrote:
May I remind you that the first reaction of John is being rude to anyone
who isn't a native speaker?
That is absolutely not true. I have reviewed this current thread and I do not
see any instance of rudeness on my part.
As I have
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 05:13:49PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
No.
John, I find you very rude in this thread. Please stop dismissing as
???reproachful, judgemental, censorious, or sanctimonious??? anyone who
dares correct your unsolicited incorrections. Yelling
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 02:58:43PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Thank you, Andy. I agree with everything you wrote, in particular how
this relates to our goal of creating a welcoming environment, which is a
main task for maintainers.
I am all for creating a welcoming
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:43:19PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
Hi,
> Please let me know if you don???t want to be bothered about this.
Problem
> is there???s exciting stuff in this patch series and I???d probably have
a
> few questions for you if you want.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:57:09AM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
Hello John,
Hello Andy,
Misgendering a guix contributor is rude.
If deliberate, I agree that misgendering anyone, guix contributor or not, would
be rude. So I have never done so.
On the grand scale of things it
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:42:10AM +, ng0 wrote:
Respecting people is more important than correct grammar.
I agree. So please afford me a little respect.
My choice of pronoun for myself is they/them. I'm not picking strawman
arguments here, all I wanted to express
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:04AM +, ng0 wrote:
John Darrington transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote:
>
> ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the
gender and/or
> prefered pronoun
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote:
ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the gender and/or
prefered pronoun of a person :)
... according to some. - but most linguists, and many orators (the president
of
the Free Software Foundation being one of
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:27:57PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
Hello, I've noticed that several packages contain "@code" structures in
their synopses, but only 'description' field supports texinfo markup.
For example, look at:
guix package -s ruby-minitest-bonus-assertions
* doc/guix.texi: Update the number of packages available.
---
doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 732f431..9b7460c 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -6807,7 +6807,7 @@ Few system services are
We now have 5001 !!
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:10:04AM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
Guix, John,
On 02/03/17 18:02, John Darrington wrote:
> commit f1021afb41613f5eba3ea4f5225b9a4cd1c15ecb
> Author: John Darrington <j...@gnu.org>
> Date: Thu Mar 2 17:5
Also pertinent:
This program is listed in https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Unrar-free
J'
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 06:54:24AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
I don't have any strong opinions here. But if somebody feels that we
really cannot
have this program in Guix, then go ahead
I don't have any strong opinions here. But if somebody feels that we really
cannot
have this program in Guix, then go ahead and revert it.
In the meantime I will try to contact the authors and ask for clarification.
However
since the project has been inactive for the last 13 years, I don't
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:59:37PM +0100, Cl??ment Lassieur wrote:
I had a look at the source of the recently commited "unrar" package, and
I could not find neither "copyright" lines nor pointers to the full
notice, except in unrarlib.h and unrarlib.c, which belong to a different
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:17:39AM +, Pjotr Prins wrote:
I would like to ask the Guix mailing list members whether it is
*acceptable* that a good looking patch has not been touched for two
weeks. Like this one
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25725
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 07:31:11PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> + (replace 'configure
> + (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> +(zero? (system* "./configure"
> +(string-append
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:30:07AM +0100, Mekeor Melire wrote:
John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:15:10PM +0100, Mekeor Melire wrote:
>
> Concerning how to implement this alias feature within G
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:15:10PM +0100, Mekeor Melire wrote:
Concerning how to implement this alias feature within Guix, I'd first
like to pose a much broader question. So, on GuixSD you have a
configuration, written in Scheme, for your operating system. Couldn't we
make
+++ b/gnu/packages/scheme.scm
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2016 Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il>
;;; Copyright © 2016 Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org>
;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017 ng0 <contact@cryptolab.net>
+;;; Copyright © 2017 John Darrington <j...@gnu.org
* gnu/packages/scheme.scm (scm): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/scheme.scm | 61 +
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/scheme.scm b/gnu/packages/scheme.scm
index 5134c24..cd3fb5b 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/scheme.scm
+++
* gnu/packages/maths.scm (jacal): New variable.
* gnu/packages/patches/jacal.texi.patch: New file.
---
gnu/packages/maths.scm| 50 +++
gnu/packages/patches/jacal.texi.patch | 90 +++
2 files changed, 140 insertions(+)
create mode
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:54:57PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:25:20PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
>
> John Darrington <j.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:25:20PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
John Darrington <j...@gnu.org> writes:
> * build-aux/texinfo.tex,ref: New file, copied from texlive-minimal
> * bootstrap: Use it, if newer than the texinfo.tex from automake.
> ---
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 01:26:49PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:04:31PM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> * build-aux/texinfo.tex,ref: New file, copied from texlive-minimal
> * bootstrap: Use it, if newer than the texinfo.tex from au
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:54:22PM +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
(define-module (gnu packages regex)
#:use-module ((guix licenses) #:prefix license:)
#:use-module (guix packages)
#:use-module (guix download)
- #:use-module (guix build-system gnu))
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:58:07PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 08:15:04PM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> * gnu/packages/games.scm (gnushogi, xshogi): New variables.
> +(define-public xshogi
[...]
> +;; Contains a copy
* gnu/packages/games.scm (gnushogi, xshogi): New variables.
---
gnu/packages/games.scm | 43 +++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/games.scm b/gnu/packages/games.scm
index 1d6a12a..50315a6 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/games.scm
+++
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:48:55PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
Sure it is!
What I meant is that Ratpoison is not the most "intuitive" WM for non
GNU Emacs/Screen users. As a consequence adding it in an example
configuration which is likely to be copy and paste, is
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 02:54:32PM +0100, David Craven wrote:
Exactly why I'm leaving. You prefer to spread and force your religion on to
people,
No we don't.
One of the defining principles of free software is that nobody is forced into
anything. And we never do it. In fact that
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 05:44:43PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:12:45PM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Hey, I'm also experiencing crashes with icecat since a few months. It
> just seems to happen randomly. I've found a note about that on the LFS
>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:48:45PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 09:46:19PM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:37:36PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 08:29:18PM +0100, John Darrington
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:37:36PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 08:29:18PM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> * Makefile.am (EXTRA_DIST): Remove build-aux/hydra/demo-os.scm
> * gnu/packages/patches/vdirsyncer-test-suite-slow-machines.patch: Remove
&
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:37:36PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 08:29:18PM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> * Makefile.am (EXTRA_DIST): Remove build-aux/hydra/demo-os.scm
> * gnu/packages/patches/vdirsyncer-test-suite-slow-machines.patch: Remove
&
* Makefile.am (EXTRA_DIST): Remove build-aux/hydra/demo-os.scm
* gnu/packages/patches/vdirsyncer-test-suite-slow-machines.patch: Remove
"/gnu/store/..."
---
Makefile.am| 1 -
gnu/packages/patches/vdirsyncer-test-suite-slow-machines.patch | 2 +-
It looks good to me.
Feel free to push to wip-installer
J'
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 05:43:18PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Hi John,
the following patch ensures that Guix can be built without the installer
in case guile-ncurses is not available. This is primarily for the
Great work!
I'm looking forward to trying it.
J'
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 04:32:18PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
Its my pleasure to announce that guix now has all the code necessary to
support aarch64! Currently support is limited to the core-updates
branch, but that shouldn't be
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:59:05AM +0100, Tomas Cech wrote:
Running GuixSD on HW not fully supported by linux-libre is painful for
me as well. I remember my first time success with GuixSD - after some
coffee and sweating I managed to deploy and boot GuixSD on my notebook
which
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:56:04PM +0100, David Craven wrote:
> I think if you posit a free software project that works in the way you
> describe ("on its own"), it would work very much like Guile works
> right now.
An operating system has to work on all hardware. Asking
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 06:15:08PM +0100, David Craven wrote:
Hi!
> Revert "import: json: Explicitly ask for JSON data."
> This reverts commit 81e0bc1834490a1a8092c75a0733b15c2b407285.
I reverted this commit in my local repository for now, it breaks the
pypi,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 11:02:29PM -0800, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
Hi,
Christopher Howard writes:
> On 02/10/2017 08:31 AM, David Craven wrote:
>> Hi Maxim
>>
>>> +1. I don't see how having blobs helps security at all.
>>
After merging a very recent master, I get four test failures when running make
check:
FAIL: tests/pypi.scm
FAIL: tests/cpan.scm
FAIL: tests/gem.scm
FAIL: tests/crate.scm
Looking in test-suite.log there is the rather odd messge:
actual-value: #f
actual-error:
+ (wrong-number-of-args
+ #f
+
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 01:49:07PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> skribis:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:01:18PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
>
> +(home-page "http://linrunne
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:01:18PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
+(home-page "http://linrunner.de/en/tlp/tlp.html;)
+(synopsis "Power management tool for Linux")
+(description "TLP is a power management tool for Linux. It comes with
Shouldn't we changed "Linux" to
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 01:30:48PM +, Pjotr Prins wrote:
@FOSDEM we concluded that GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH does not necessarily work
that wel. I added to my guix-notes the following:
+Note that, even though GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH can be a feasible way of
+adding and maintaining
Yesterday I did "guix package --upgrade" and now, a simple latex file:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin {document}
This is a test.
\end {document}
fails with
/gnu/store/161gb51263qn8kydvdcd3jq6bcax3abf-texlive-texmf-minimal-2016/share/texmf-dist/web2c/mktexnam:
Could
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:56:15PM +0800, ? wrote:
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (openvswitch): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 54
+
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
diff --git
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:15:12PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
> Ludovic Court??s writes:
>
>> Georgi Kirilov skribis:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 04:34:55PM +0100,
It now supports btrfs. Feel free to give it a whirl.
J'
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 02:24:53PM +0100, David Craven wrote:
Hi John,
I looked at adding btrfs support,
--
Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D
The git package ships with a number of sample hook files. These are shell
scripts and
therefore the #!/bin/sh line gets substituted at build time.
However these files get installed into every git repostory that is created, and
users
are invited to use them as templates for their own hooks.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:27:11PM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
Hello,
To confirm, I've now placed a reservation for Saturday 4 February at
19:30 at a Lebanese restaurant called Al Jannah. I haven't been there
before, but the menu looks diverse, the prices good and
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:30:26PM +0200, Georgi Kirilov wrote:
Hi,
is there anything in Guix that can do things at install time, like postinst
scripts in Debian?
A program in a package I created is trying to access /var, but has no
permissions. (Well,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:52:35PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Court??s) skribis:
> Pushed with tests as 384344198dcaa97847e66d3dd82f279ede08d690.
And if you get a weird error when running ???make??? about
???file-system-needed-for-boot,
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 01:20:56AM -0800, Chris Marusich wrote:
John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> writes:
> * It would be great if you could try to find out why your wireless
failed.
I'll look into it. FWIW, the following DOES work for sett
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:24:30PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Then maybe this:
(define (file-system-needed-for-boot? fs)
(or (%file-system-needed-for-boot? fs)
(and (file-prefix? (file-system-needed-for-boot? fs)
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:34:02AM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Hi!
Regarding networking, would it make sense to use Connman (or
NetworkManger? or Wicd?) and simply talk to it?
I???ve never used it but it seems that Connman is a good middle ground.
We can
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 01:20:56AM -0800, Chris Marusich wrote:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
config_file="$(mktemp --tmpdir wireless-X.cfg)"
trap "rm -f $config_file" EXIT
cat > "$config_file" << EOM
network={
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:53:02AM +0100, David Craven wrote:
> will erroneously return #t when (file-system-mount-point fs) evaluates
> to "/gn" and (%store-directory) to "/gnu/store". Will it not???
The trick is to revert the arguments:
(string-prefix?
Hi Chris,
Thanks for this very comprehensive feedback. I hope you will forgive
me if I don't respond to every point you have raised. I have however read
them all, and they are all relevant and useful. So thanks very much.
Some particular points however:
* Currently there is no mouse support
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:30:43PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
> * gnu/system/file-systems.scm (all-subpaths): New procedure.
> (file-system-needed-for-boot?): Use it to check for ancestors
> of %store-directory.
I guess the idea is to have ???needed-for-boot
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 09:22:01AM -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
I'm seeing a trend where people write services with configuration
types that don't cover nearly the amount of configuration options to
make the service useful. MySQL, and now this Redis server, are
examples of
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:48:20PM +0800, tumashu wrote:
"guix system reconfigure" can't work well in my machine now, the below
is output:
--
bash-4.4$ sudo guix system reconfigure guixsd-helper.scm
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:59:20AM -0800, Chris Marusich wrote:
Is this procedure supposed to work with relative paths? I get strange
results for "foo/bar":
No. It was not indended to be passed a relative path. I cannot see what
meaning
that would have - it raises the question
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 03:06:41PM +0800, tumashu wrote:
If we can package Adobe Flash Player, can we package a installer-helper,
like: https://packages.debian.org/stretch/flashplugin-nonfree
But as Chris said, unfortunately we cannot. :(
--
Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:40:17PM -0800, Chris Marusich wrote:
John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> writes:
> The wip-installer branch is ready for testing and general review.
>
> This branch provides a curses based graphical interface to the dis
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 05:11:03PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:18:38PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> So, I think we should carefully check each package that uses ImageMagick
> directly to see if they are ready. We can check their commit logs and
> bug
Why bother with the replacement? Why not just upgrade it?
J'
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:13:53PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
* gnu/packages/ed.scm (ed-1.14.1): New variable.
(ed)[replacement]: New field.
---
gnu/packages/ed.scm | 13 +
1 file changed, 13
* gnu/packages/xorg.scm (xfd): Remove wrapper.
---
gnu/packages/xorg.scm | 12 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
index 16eb344..45ff4c9 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
@@ -4015,19
/packages/xorg.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2016 ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
;;; Copyright © 2016 Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com>
;;; Copyright © 2016 David Craven <da...@craven.ch>
-;;; Copyright © 2016 John Darrington <j...@gnu.org>
+;;
* gnu/packages/xorg.scm (editres): Replace string literal with
%app-defaults-dir.
---
gnu/packages/xorg.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
index 556b9f4..16eb344 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
+++
* gnu/packages/xfig.scm (xfig): Use modify-phases.
---
gnu/packages/xfig.scm | 159 +-
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfig.scm b/gnu/packages/xfig.scm
index 6436e52..27d9cf9 100644
---
* gnu/system/file-systems.scm (all-subpaths): New procedure.
(file-system-needed-for-boot?): Use it to check for ancestors
of %store-directory.
---
gnu/system/file-systems.scm | 25 ++---
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
* gnu/system/file-systems.scm (all-subpaths): New procedure.
(file-system-needed-for-boot?): Use it to check for ancestors
of %store-directory.
---
gnu/system/file-systems.scm | 25 ++---
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
The procedures exported from guix/build/syscalls :
network-interface-names
network-interface-flags
set-network-interface-flags
network-interface-netmask
.. and possibily a few others all take an argument called "sock" or "socket".
In the case of network-interface-names this parameter is
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:39:01AM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> skribis:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 11:34:26PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
[...]
>2. Pressing F9 (language) replaces line
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 11:34:26PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
I did a quick test and I think it???s pretty cool. :-)
Thanks.
A few issues I noticed:
1. ???Go Back??? often doesn???t go back (for instance from the
???Choose the
mount point for
1 - 100 of 530 matches
Mail list logo