Fwd: Re: /dev/urandom

2018-07-11 Thread doncatnip
Of course, I forgot the CC. Forwarded Message Subject:Re: /dev/urandom Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:58:14 +0100 From: Steffen Schulz To: Leo Famulari I probably got it wrong. but it seems the programs purpose is to build images (boot loaders). I then wonder

Fwd: Re: /dev/urandom

2018-07-11 Thread doncatnip
Of course, I forgot the CC here too. Forwarded Message Subject:Re: /dev/urandom Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:38:52 +0200 From: doncatnip To: Vincent Legoll I'd guess this is about the distribution of blocks within the image, so that the load of each sector

[PATCH] gnu: awesome: Update to 3.5.9.

2016-09-01 Thread doncatnip
Hey Guix ! Let's try this again.>From 99ac37565b7a4826c9ca3c9f0545825924effc3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: doncatnip <gno...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 23:08:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: lua: Remove conflicting flag, pass MYCFLAGS * gnu/packages/lua.scm (lua)[argume

[PATCH] gnu: gtk: Add clipit.

2016-08-31 Thread doncatnip
Hey Guix, This patch adds ClipIt (clipit) to the repository. Tested with lint, build rounds=2 and actual usability.>From 82051a27d1ca6131ad6295fad95e0bc19cc22bfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: doncatnip <gno...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 03:15:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gtk: A

Re: [PATCH] gnu: awesome: Add awesome-3.5

2016-08-26 Thread doncatnip
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:59:51 + ng0 wrote: > > Works for me (written from inside a running awesome-3.5.9). > > ng0@shadowwalker ~$ awesome --version > awesome v3.5.9 (Mighty Ravendark) > • Build: Sun Mar 06 14:05:54Z 2016 for x86_64 by gcc version 4.9.3 (@) > •

Re: [PATCH] gnu: awesome: Add awesome-3.5

2016-08-25 Thread doncatnip
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:47:19 + ng0 wrote: I'm sorry, I just don't really know what to say about this as my experience with hardening is rather non-existant. I can sure find out how to disable dbus and submit another patch. > ng0 writes:

Re: [PATCH] gnu: awesome: Add awesome-3.5

2016-08-25 Thread doncatnip
lying with the intention to not message offlist? > > I think gnu.org does not set a reply-to thing, my email client does > not care or know about such settings though. > > doncatnip <gno...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:22:38 + > > ng0 <n...@