ayman, hence
reality checks..)
In any case, glad to receive and answer. Keep up the good work! :)
Kind regards,
- Ilmu
automated and the network self-perpetuating.
I am also very interested in making a "nixos-infect" type thing for Guix and
asked about that in the past on the mailing lists.
Let me know how you decide to proceed, I'm sure we can cooperate.
Kind regards,
- Ilmu
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
ompiler may
give the same binary and then updating a compiler will allow you to only
rebuild transitive closures of programs that depended on changed behaviors
between versions.
To drive the point home: If the artefact has the same hash as it did before
then clearly the underlying change did not affect it. Early cut-off is
therefore not possible in the case where the program being depended on is
supposed to be used at runtime.
This is at least how I am thinking about it, I think this would be a good
incremental improvement on the state of the art but it would still have these
limitations.
Kind regards,
- ilmu
as they are discovered.
I hope I am not a raving madman and that this actually makes at least a slight
amount of sense. Very much looking forward to takedowns :)
Kind regards,
- Ilmu
