Hi Ricardo,
Happy New Year !!
> We can connect a graph by joining the inputs of one process with the
> outputs of another.
>
> With a content addressed store we would run processes in isolation and
> map the declared data inputs into the environment. Instead of working
> on the global
Hi simon,
>> > 6.
>> > The graph of dependencies between the processes/units/rules is written
>> > by hand. What should be the best strategy to capture it ? By files "à
>> > la" Snakemake ? Other ?
>>
>> The GWL currently does not use the input information provided by the
>> user in the
Dear,
> I’m working on updating the GWL manual to show a simple wispy example.
Nice!
I am also giving a deeper look at the manual. :-)
> > Some GWL scripts are already there.
> I only know of Roel’s ATACseq workflow[1], but we could add a few more
> independent process definitions for simple
Hi simon,
> Here, I would like to collect some discussions or ideas about the Guix
> Workflow Language (GWL) and the next steps of this awesome tool!
thanks for kicking off this discussion!
> With wisp, the workflow description seems close to CWL, which is an argument
> ;-)
> Last time, I
Dear Guixers,
... or at least some of them :-)
Here, I would like to collect some discussions or ideas about the Guix
Workflow Language (GWL) and the next steps of this awesome tool!
For those who do not know.
About workflow language, Wikipedia says:
