Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2016-01-08 Thread Ben Woodcroft
On 08/01/16 00:31, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hi Ben, Do you have an account on Savannah? If not, I invite you to create one so we can give you write access to the repo. :-) Sweet, thanks muchly. My new savannah account name is benwoodcroft I'll try not to mess things up too badly. Great to be

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2016-01-08 Thread Thompson, David
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Ben Woodcroft writes: > >> On 02/01/16 01:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > [...] >>> So I guess you (Ricardo?) can push it now. > [...] >> Thanks for pushing the patch. > > I did this just

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2016-01-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Ben Woodcroft skribis: > On 08/01/16 00:31, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hi Ben, >> >> Do you have an account on Savannah? If not, I invite you to create one >> so we can give you write access to the repo. :-) > Sweet, thanks muchly. > > My new savannah account name is

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2016-01-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Ben, Do you have an account on Savannah? If not, I invite you to create one so we can give you write access to the repo. :-) Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2016-01-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Ben Woodcroft writes: > >> On 02/01/16 01:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > [...] >>> So I guess you (Ricardo?) can push it now. > [...] >> Thanks for pushing the patch. > > I did this just now. Sorry for the delay.

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2016-01-06 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ben Woodcroft writes: > On 02/01/16 01:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote: [...] >> So I guess you (Ricardo?) can push it now. [...] > Thanks for pushing the patch. I did this just now. Sorry for the delay. Pushed as 7266848. Thanks, Ben, for helping to make Ruby packages

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2016-01-02 Thread Ben Woodcroft
On 02/01/16 01:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Ricardo Wurmus skribis: Ben Woodcroft writes: On 31/12/15 03:26, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Ben Woodcroft skribis: On 29/12/15 15:46, Ben Woodcroft wrote: Unfortunately none of

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2016-01-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Ben Woodcroft writes: > >> On 31/12/15 03:26, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >>> Ben Woodcroft skribis: >>> On 29/12/15 15:46, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > Unfortunately none of these builds are reproducible

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2015-12-31 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ben Woodcroft writes: > On 31/12/15 03:26, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Ben Woodcroft skribis: >> >>> On 29/12/15 15:46, Ben Woodcroft wrote: Unfortunately none of these builds are reproducible because rubygems in Guix generally aren't. For

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2015-12-31 Thread Ben Woodcroft
On 31/12/15 09:52, Ben Woodcroft wrote: On 30/12/15 18:26, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: Ben Woodcroft writes: The .gem file stored in GEM_HOME after install is both redundant and an archive that stores timestamped files which makes builds non-deterministic. So delete it

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2015-12-30 Thread Ben Woodcroft
On 31/12/15 03:26, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Ben Woodcroft skribis: On 29/12/15 15:46, Ben Woodcroft wrote: Unfortunately none of these builds are reproducible because rubygems in Guix generally aren't. For one, this is because .gem files are archives whose contents are

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2015-12-30 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ben Woodcroft writes: > From 3d23171d88b9f38c90efa469f6519b52b15a1d01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ben Woodcroft > Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:27:33 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] build: ruby: Remove cached gem after install. > The .gem file stored

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2015-12-29 Thread Pjotr Prins
Excellent. On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:56:06AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > On 30/12/15 10:51, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > >Too ham-fisted? > Maybe, but badly committed at least. Try this. > From 3d23171d88b9f38c90efa469f6519b52b15a1d01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ben Woodcroft

[PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible (was: [PATCH] Add 12 rubygems.)

2015-12-29 Thread Ben Woodcroft
On 29/12/15 17:18, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: Ben Woodcroft writes: Unfortunately none of these builds are reproducible because rubygems in Guix generally aren't. For one, this is because .gem files are archives whose contents are timestamped. I found the same problem with

Re: [PATCH] Help Ruby packages be reproducible

2015-12-29 Thread Ben Woodcroft
On 30/12/15 10:51, Ben Woodcroft wrote: Too ham-fisted? Maybe, but badly committed at least. Try this. >From 3d23171d88b9f38c90efa469f6519b52b15a1d01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Woodcroft Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:27:33 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] build: ruby: Remove