Roel Janssen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Roel Janssen skribis:
>>
>>> This patch adds a -p and --prompt-name argument to @code{guix
>>> environment}, and puts the argument's value between the square brackets
>>> instead of "env".
>>
>> Sounds like a good idea! Maybe ‘--pro
;.
I wanted to use --name first, but it doesn't explain why we would use -p
for the short option instead of -n (which is already taken by --dry-run).
WDYT?
>>>From ea958e847019c94a2bde49285f1436dfec72e570 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Roel Janssen
>> Date: Thu
e
a name? WDYT?
>>From ea958e847019c94a2bde49285f1436dfec72e570 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roel Janssen
> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:07:15 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] environment: Add a prompt-name argument.
>
> * guix/scripts/environment.scm: Add --prompt-name (-p) argument.
Some
ing for the argument is
(prompt-name). So, I have two questions:
0. Do you think we should apply this patch?
1. What name should the argument have?
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
>From ea958e847019c94a2bde49285f1436dfec72e570 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:0
