Kei Kebreau writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:39:42PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
Kei Kebreau writes:
> Reviewers, how does this patch
Marius Bakke writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:39:42PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>>> Kei Kebreau writes:
>>>
>>> > Reviewers, how does this patch look to you?
>>>
>>> AFAIU from CVE-2017-0358,
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:39:42PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Kei Kebreau writes:
>>
>> > Reviewers, how does this patch look to you?
>>
>> AFAIU from CVE-2017-0358, ntfs-3g is only vulnerable when installed
>> setuid root,
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:39:42PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Kei Kebreau writes:
>
> > Reviewers, how does this patch look to you?
>
> AFAIU from CVE-2017-0358, ntfs-3g is only vulnerable when installed
> setuid root, which is not the case on guix.
>
> FWIW Debian do
Kei Kebreau writes:
> Reviewers, how does this patch look to you?
AFAIU from CVE-2017-0358, ntfs-3g is only vulnerable when installed
setuid root, which is not the case on guix.
FWIW Debian do not carry this patch, but have fixed the CVE according to
the changelog. So I
Reviewers, how does this patch look to you?
From 2de5fc0267f94bf933f1e52dc8ef348bd3f78059 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kei Kebreau <k...@openmailbox.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:31:25 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ntfs-3g: Fix CVE-2017-0358.
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (ntfs-3g)[source]: Add