Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-12 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:49:38AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (acme-client): New variable. Thanks for the feedback, everyone. Pushed as 0581c273a4d5171a477d89f109c46d7ab3691429, with a followup commit that adds some detail to certbot's synopsis.

Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-11 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 11.09.2016 um 14:42 schrieb Andreas Enge: > Maybe one solution would be to call the first program "acme-client", > and, if it ever gets packaged, the second one "ruby-acme-client" and so on? This sound good to me. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel |

Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-11 Thread Andreas Enge
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 10:29:12PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:04:13PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > > Is there other reasonably widely used software with this name? Our package > > guidelines say to use the upstream name. > > Here is what I found: > >

Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-03 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 11:32:20AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Many distros prefix OpenBSD projects with ambigous names with >> "openbsd-". E.g. "openbsd-netcat", "openbsd-ntpd" etc. We don't appear >> to have that problem yet, but I think this could

Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-03 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 11:32:20AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Many distros prefix OpenBSD projects with ambigous names with > "openbsd-". E.g. "openbsd-netcat", "openbsd-ntpd" etc. We don't appear > to have that problem yet, but I think this could be a good precedent. Is "openbsd-ntpd" the same

Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-03 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:04:13PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > Is there other reasonably widely used software with this name? Our package > guidelines say to use the upstream name. Here is what I found: https://github.com/kristapsdz/acme-client The program I have proposed to package.

Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-03 Thread Marius Bakke
Andreas Enge writes: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:50:28PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: >> > Am 02.09.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Leo Famulari: >> > > +(name "acme-client") >> > I strongly suggest using a different

Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-03 Thread Andreas Enge
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:50:28PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > > Am 02.09.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Leo Famulari: > > > +(name "acme-client") > > I strongly suggest using a different name, as this is *one* of many > >

Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-03 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 02.09.2016 um 20:50 schrieb Leo Famulari: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: >> Am 02.09.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Leo Famulari: >>> +(name "acme-client") >>> > Suggestions? acme-client-openbsd? But given that this is a stupid name, and given that

Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-02 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:50:28PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > *shiver* Why would one implement this in an language like C, which is > > prone to buffer overflows, if there are implementations available in > > more secure languages? > > I wouldn't propose this package if it wasn't part of

Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-02 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Am 02.09.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Leo Famulari: > > +(name "acme-client") > > I strongly suggest using a different name, as this is *one* of many > implementations and it is not the "official" one. Suggestions? > *shiver* Why

Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-02 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 02.09.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Leo Famulari: > +(name "acme-client") I strongly suggest using a different name, as this is *one* of many implementations and it is not the "official" one. > +(synopsis "Let's Encrypt client") The synopsis should already state, this is *one* of the

[PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.

2016-09-02 Thread Leo Famulari
* gnu/packages/tls.scm (acme-client): New variable. --- gnu/packages/tls.scm | 35 +++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/tls.scm b/gnu/packages/tls.scm index 4b87150..eeb15ca 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/tls.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/tls.scm @@