Hi,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> Ludovic Courtès skribis:
>
>> How about the attached patch?
>>
>> $ ./pre-inst-env guix lint -c archival ruby-sorbet-runtime racket
>> gnu/packages/ruby.scm:14081:12:
>> ruby-sorbet-runtime@0.5.10610.20230106174520-1fa668010: source is
>> not an origin, it
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> How about the attached patch?
>
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix lint -c archival ruby-sorbet-runtime racket
> gnu/packages/ruby.scm:14081:12:
> ruby-sorbet-runtime@0.5.10610.20230106174520-1fa668010: source is not an
> origin, it cannot be archived
>
> (The version
Hello!
Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> So I guess as a matter of policy, we should try and find other ways to
>> express this so we don’t lose track of origins.
>
> Thanks for explaining, it makes sense. One way to tip package writers
> in the right direction
Hi,
On Tue, 02 May 2023 at 08:52, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Thanks for explaining, it makes sense. One way to tip package writers
> in the right direction would be to add a warning when such a situation
> occurs upon running 'guix lint'.
Somehow improve “guix lint -c archival”. ;-)
> Simon's
Hi Ludo,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>
>> Simon Tournier writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I agree that any file-like object is nice. Somehow, the issue is to
>>> “unpack“ the information of this object. For instance,
>>>
>>> scheme@(guix-user)> (define
Hello,
Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
> Simon Tournier writes:
[...]
>> I agree that any file-like object is nice. Somehow, the issue is to
>> “unpack“ the information of this object. For instance,
>>
>> scheme@(guix-user)> (define ruby-sorbet-runtime (@@ (gnu packages ruby)
>>
Hi Simon,
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi Ludo, Maxim, all,
>
> On mar., 25 avril 2023 at 14:40, Ludovic Courtès
> wrote:
>
>>> Somehow, it reveals 3 currently uncovered cases: computed-file appearing
>>> as,
>>>
>>> 1. ’origin’ in source field (ruby-sorbet-runtime)
>>> 2. ’inputs’
Hi Ludo, Maxim, all,
On mar., 25 avril 2023 at 14:40, Ludovic Courtès
wrote:
>> Somehow, it reveals 3 currently uncovered cases: computed-file appearing
>> as,
>>
>> 1. ’origin’ in source field (ruby-sorbet-runtime)
>> 2. ’inputs’ (racket-minimal)
>> 3. ’snippet’ in origin in source field
Hi Simon,
Simon Tournier writes:
[...]
> $ guix repl -- build-package-metadata.scm /tmp/
> guix repl: package metadata will be written to '/tmp/'
> Backtrace:
>
> [...]
>
> In procedure %origin-patches-real: Wrong type argument: #<
> name:
Hello,
(+Cc: guix-sysadmin)
Simon Tournier skribis:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 at 18:41, Ludovic Courtès
> wrote:
>
>> How does that sound?
>
> The patch LGTM.
Applied in maintenance.git commit
b7af47ceb629b2267ea8c28dbe5750a456be0b8f.
I’ll reconfigure berlin soonish to it runs this updated
Hi!
Simon Tournier skribis:
> PS: On a side note, building sources.json fails since ~1 month.
>
> $ guix repl -- build-package-metadata.scm /tmp/
> guix repl: package metadata will be written to '/tmp/'
> Backtrace:
>
> [...]
>
> In procedure %origin-patches-real: Wrong type argument: #<
>
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 at 18:41, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> How does that sound?
The patch LGTM.
Cheers,
simon
PS: On a side note, building sources.json fails since ~1 month.
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix repl -- build-package-metadata.scm /tmp/
Hi,
Simon Tournier skribis:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 12:48, Ludovic Courtès
> wrote:
>
>> 1. Reproducibility of past revisions. If we lose copies of the
>> auto-generated tarballs, then OpenJDK in past revisions of Guix is
>> irreparably lost. We should check whether/how to get
13 matches
Mail list logo