On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 06:52:54PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 08:02:08AM +, ng0 wrote:
> >> Libreoffice is able to do that aswell. It doesn't use libwmf, right?
> >
> > It looks like libreoffice has its own
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 08:02:08AM +, ng0 wrote:
>> Libreoffice is able to do that aswell. It doesn't use libwmf, right?
>
> It looks like libreoffice has its own implementation for handling WMF
> files.
I'm okay with removing libwmf from Guix.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 08:02:08AM +, ng0 wrote:
> Libreoffice is able to do that aswell. It doesn't use libwmf, right?
It looks like libreoffice has its own implementation for handling WMF
files.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.9K bytes:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
>
> > On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 03:06:35PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> >> Am 27.05.2017 um 23:13 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
> >> > I think it would be better to remove libwmf.
> >> +1
> >
> > Something to consider
Ricardo Wurmus transcribed 1.4K bytes:
>
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
> > Leo Famulari writes:
> >
> >> The last update to libwmf was twelve years ago, in 2005. In the
> >> meantime, a large number of security issues have been discovered in this
> >> library.
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 10:57:49PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
>
> > On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 03:06:35PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> >> Am 27.05.2017 um 23:13 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
> >> > I think it would be better to remove libwmf.
> >> +1
> >
>
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 03:06:35PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> Am 27.05.2017 um 23:13 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
> > I think it would be better to remove libwmf.
> +1
Something to consider is that many of our packages can be described as
unmaintained and full of bugs. And even the packages that
Am 27.05.2017 um 23:13 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
> I think it would be better to remove libwmf.
+1
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> The last update to libwmf was twelve years ago, in 2005. In the
>> meantime, a large number of security issues have been discovered in this
>> library. These bugs are fixed somewhat haphazardly by the
Leo Famulari writes:
> The last update to libwmf was twelve years ago, in 2005. In the
> meantime, a large number of security issues have been discovered in this
> library. These bugs are fixed somewhat haphazardly by the distributions.
>
> While working on patching
The last update to libwmf was twelve years ago, in 2005. In the
meantime, a large number of security issues have been discovered in this
library. These bugs are fixed somewhat haphazardly by the distributions.
While working on patching CVE-2016-9011 in libwmf, and backporting fixes
for
11 matches
Mail list logo