Hi,
Using the Mathieu’s script to pick one missing package from
core-updates-frozen, ’python2-google-api-client’ pops up. Initially, I
thought to simply remove it because it is Python 2 and Python 2 is EOL.
Well, ’python2-google-api-client’ builds fine on master. Therefore, let
try to build
=https://ci.guix.gnu.org -c 10 -s ${system}-linux 2>&1 | tee
~/tmp/reports/${branch}-${system}-linux; done < systems; done < branches
... along with two files, 'branches' and 'systems' which contain this,
respectively:
core-updates-frozen
armhf
aarch64
i686
x86_64
ol!
>
>Is it possible to “guix weather” a specific branch? If it makes
>sense. :-)
>
>Cheers,
>simon
From my git worktree of core-updates-frozen I'll run ./pre-inst-env guix
weather with some flags and that works for me.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 13:33, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I assumed we're in the 'find your packages and fix them' phase. Some I
> have on my TODO list are sddm, glibc-2.31 and ruby-asciidoctor.
Cool!
Is it possible to “guix weather” a specific branch? If it makes
sense. :-)
Cheers,
simon
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 02:40:26PM +0200, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 13:50, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
>
> > A new core-updates-frozen branch is available here:
> > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?h=core-updates-frozen.
>
> Coo
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 13:50, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
> A new core-updates-frozen branch is available here:
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?h=core-updates-frozen.
Cool!
> Your help is welcome :).
What is the schedule for the merge?
(I am back from
> able to get you started. Could you send us an account name and SSH
> public key?
Thanks! I sent it in private.
> >> (bordeaux.guix does have a POWER9 build machine behind, but it’s not
> >> building ‘core-updates-frozen’ currently.)
> >
> > Nice! I’d be glad t
hieu, Tobias, and guix-sysad...@gnu.org should be
able to get you started. Could you send us an account name and SSH
public key?
>> (bordeaux.guix does have a POWER9 build machine behind, but it’s not
>> building ‘core-updates-frozen’ currently.)
>
> Nice! I’d be glad to help with
ting this branch here:
> >> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates-frozen. According to the
> >> related dashboard, there's still a bit of work required to stabilize
> >> this branch: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/68124/dashboard.
> >
> > There are no res
Hi!
Thiago Jung Bauermann skribis:
> Em quarta-feira, 28 de julho de 2021, às 08:50:16 -03, Mathieu Othacehe
> escreveu:
[...]
>> This means that the core-updates branch remains open, while the
>> core-updates-frozen branch will only accept bug fixes.
>>
>> Thi
Hello!
Em quarta-feira, 28 de julho de 2021, às 08:50:16 -03, Mathieu Othacehe
escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> A new core-updates-frozen branch is available here:
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?h=core-updates-frozen.
Hooray!
> This means that the core-updates bran
Hello,
A new core-updates-frozen branch is available here:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?h=core-updates-frozen.
This means that the core-updates branch remains open, while the
core-updates-frozen branch will only accept bug fixes.
This branch contains exciting new features
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> The Core-updates bootstrap (code named "Scheme-only bootstrap") removes
>>
>> Awk, Bash, the GNU Core Utilities, Grep, Gzip, Sed, and Tar.
>>
>> and replaces them with Gash and Gash-Utils!
>
> That’s worth a second blog post! :-)
Yes, let's do that when core-updates
Hi!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> For the record...it's even better: The GCC, binutils and glibc
> removal mentioned above is already in master; so our next release will
> bootstrap from ~135MB like blog post mentions!
>
> The Core-updates bootstrap (code named "Scheme-only bootstrap") removes
>
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>> For those unaware, this means that the set of trusted binaries at the
>> root of the package graph from which everything else derives is only 60
>> MiB (on i686 and x86_64). The set no longer includes GCC, binutils, or
>> glibc!
>
>> For more information, see
Marius Bakke writes:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>
>> Marius Bakke writes:
>>
>>> The branch currently represents 676 commits by 26 people. Some
>>> highlights from this round:
>>>
>>> * Guix runs natively on GNU/Hurd.
>>> * Guix System can be cross-compiled for foreign architectures.
>>> * The
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>
>> These are exciting changes! Let's also not forget:
>>
>> * for x86 and x86_64: another reduction of the bootstrap binary seed by
>> roughly %0%, to ~60MB!
>
> %0%? :p
Hah -- should have been yeah, 50%!
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> The branch currently represents 676 commits by 26 people. Some
>> highlights from this round:
>>
>> * Guix runs natively on GNU/Hurd.
>> * Guix System can be cross-compiled for foreign architectures.
>> * The distribution is built with Guile
Marius Bakke writes:
> The branch currently represents 676 commits by 26 people. Some
> highlights from this round:
>
> * Guix runs natively on GNU/Hurd.
> * Guix System can be cross-compiled for foreign architectures.
> * The distribution is built with Guile 3.0.
> * GNOME 3.34 (on a separate
Hello Guix!
The 'core-updates' branch is now in a "feature freeze" after a long ...
thawing period. That means that there will be no more world rebuilding
changes apart from bug fixes[*].
It is expected to start the full rebuild in a few days once the
bootstrap is complete on AArch64 and ARMv7,
I've sent a few patches to fix a couple of build issues on the
core-updates branch [1][2].
1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36641
2: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36643
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello!
>
> Marius Bakke skribis:
>
>> The 'core-updates' branch is ready for testing! This is a very early
>> stage, so many substitutes are missing. Consider yourself warned ;-)
>
> Yay!
>
>> ** GNU/Hurd no longer uses a special glibc variant.
>
> That’s the case
Hello!
Marius Bakke skribis:
> The 'core-updates' branch is ready for testing! This is a very early
> stage, so many substitutes are missing. Consider yourself warned ;-)
Yay!
> ** GNU/Hurd no longer uses a special glibc variant.
That’s the case since the previous ‘core-updates’ merge.
Guix,
The 'core-updates' branch is ready for testing! This is a very early
stage, so many substitutes are missing. Consider yourself warned ;-)
I have compiled a summary of the changes below. The package updates are
too numerous to list here; try `git shortlog -n master..core-updates`
for the
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:33:52PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Note that 1.19.3 will be released shortly since 1.19.2 had a release bug
> that requires running `autoreconf`. See:
>
> https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2017-March/002780.html
Ooookay :)
> > I've been reconfiguring my
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:02:04AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>> > Once these changes are pushed, I'll start a new evaluation:
>> >
>> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-03/msg00063.html
>> >
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:02:04AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
> > Once these changes are pushed, I'll start a new evaluation:
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-03/msg00063.html
> >
> > Please, no more rebuild the world changes
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 03:30:59PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:05:04AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> > So, here’s a plan:
>> >
>> > • Once Efraim has pushed some of the aarch64 patches, do another
>> > evaluation
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 03:30:59PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:05:04AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > So, here’s a plan:
> >
> > • Once Efraim has pushed some of the aarch64 patches, do another
> > evaluation of the “core” package set for that branch, and
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:05:04AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> So, here’s a plan:
>
> • Once Efraim has pushed some of the aarch64 patches, do another
> evaluation of the “core” package set for that branch, and check for
> anything wrong. From there on, forbid full-rebuild changes.
It’s merged now!
There are still broken packages. Please check
http://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/master and help fix them. Each person
fixing something will get a proportion of my gratitude proportional to
the amount of fixing. :-)
Ludo’.
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Unfortunately, the MIPS box for Hydra is currently off-line, so I don’t
have any feedback. It would be great if you could start building the
branch.
I tried building 'hello' with v0.6-389-g1319cfe and got as far as gawk,
which failed its test suite with
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org writes:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Unfortunately, the MIPS box for Hydra is currently off-line, so I don’t
have any feedback. It would be great if you could start building the
branch.
I tried building 'hello' with v0.6-389-g1319cfe and got as far
Hi, Mark,
Thanks for testing!
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Unfortunately, the MIPS box for Hydra is currently off-line, so I don’t
have any feedback. It would be great if you could start building the
branch.
I tried building 'hello' with
Beware, gawk 4.1.1 was bootstrapped with an unreleased libtool:
--8---cut here---start-8---
~/src/gawk-4.1.1/extension$ ./libtool --version
libtool (GNU libtool) 2.4.2.418
Written by Gordon Matzigkeit g...@gnu.ai.mit.edu, 1996
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software
Hello!
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
As discussed before, we’ll merge the branch before June 13th.
The branch is now frozen. Hydra is building it all now, and unless
something goes wrong, I’ll merge
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
I'm sorry I haven't had time to look into this, but in April I tried to
build GCC 4.9.0 on my YeeLoong and it failed.
That doesn’t look Guix-specific, no?
No, it doesn't.
Unless it has been fixed since then,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
As discussed before, we’ll merge the branch before June 13th.
The branch is now frozen. Hydra is building it all now, and unless
something goes wrong, I’ll merge it once it’s done building it.
I just fixed a
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
As discussed before, we’ll merge the branch before June 13th.
The branch is now frozen. Hydra is building it all now, and unless
something goes wrong, I’ll merge it once it’s done building it.
I'm sorry I
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo