Re: Don't change "+" syntax in guix/.dir-locals.el

Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-29 21:31 +0200) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-28 11:34 +0200) wrote: [...] >>> Basically if you don’t have it, when you type “#$(foo)”, Paredit inserts >>> a space before the opening parenthesis. >> >> OK, I see now. Paredit inserts a space

Re: Don't change "+" syntax in guix/.dir-locals.el

Hi Alex, Alex Kost skribis: > Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-28 11:34 +0200) wrote: > >> Alex Kost skribis: >> >>> Highlighting? Sorry, I don't understand what you mean: highlighting >>> will not be effected in any way. The problem is that those >>> 'modify-syntax-entry' lines in ".dir-locals.el"

Re: Don't change "+" syntax in guix/.dir-locals.el

Alex Kost writes: > Now I understand why this problem should be fixed, but my opinion is > that ".dir-locals.el" *should not* break the default syntax table of > scheme-mode just to make one emacs package work as desired. Agreed. -- Pierre Neidhardt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Don't change "+" syntax in guix/.dir-locals.el

Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-28 11:34 +0200) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Highlighting? Sorry, I don't understand what you mean: highlighting >> will not be effected in any way. The problem is that those >> 'modify-syntax-entry' lines in ".dir-locals.el" break the default syntax >> table of

Re: Don't change "+" syntax in guix/.dir-locals.el

Alex Kost skribis: > Highlighting? Sorry, I don't understand what you mean: highlighting > will not be effected in any way. The problem is that those > 'modify-syntax-entry' lines in ".dir-locals.el" break the default syntax > table of scheme-mode, so "+", "$" and "~"

Re: Don't change "+" syntax in guix/.dir-locals.el

Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-23 14:33 +0200) wrote: > Hello! > > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Pierre Neidhardt (2018-05-20 21:57 +0200) wrote: >> >>> I recently noticed that guix-devel-mode misbehaved on packages ending >>> with a "+" (like my recent emacs-image+). >>> >>> See

Re: Don't change "+" syntax in guix/.dir-locals.el

Hello! Alex Kost skribis: > Pierre Neidhardt (2018-05-20 21:57 +0200) wrote: > >> I recently noticed that guix-devel-mode misbehaved on packages ending >> with a "+" (like my recent emacs-image+). >> >> See https://github.com/alezost/guix.el/issues/24 for more details. >> >>

Re: Don't change "+" syntax in guix/.dir-locals.el

Pierre Neidhardt (2018-05-20 21:57 +0200) wrote: > I recently noticed that guix-devel-mode misbehaved on packages ending > with a "+" (like my recent emacs-image+). > > See https://github.com/alezost/guix.el/issues/24 for more details. > > Alex Kost suggested we removed the syntax change in

Don't change "+" syntax in guix/.dir-locals.el

I recently noticed that guix-devel-mode misbehaved on packages ending with a "+" (like my recent emacs-image+). See https://github.com/alezost/guix.el/issues/24 for more details. Alex Kost suggested we removed the syntax change in .dir-locals.el: --8<---cut