Hi,
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Keeping the directory tree of the extension separate from the “guix
> pull” profile would ensure that the core features of Guix keep working,
> no matter how badly broken an extension might be.
Yeah.
> So I’m thinking that we should instead define
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> What if an extension could instead be a package installed next to Guix
> and its channels in ~/.config/guix/current, and we use
> ‘package-path-entries’ as is done in (gnu packages) to augment
> ‘%load-path’ and ‘%load-compiled-path’?
I’m not sure if that would
Hi!
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>>
>>> I think it’s a bit difficult to install the Guix Workflow Language at
>>> this point and I’d like to change that.
>>>
>>> Currently, new sub-commands for Guix are looked up by module name on
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello!
>
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> I think it’s a bit difficult to install the Guix Workflow Language at
>> this point and I’d like to change that.
>>
>> Currently, new sub-commands for Guix are looked up by module name on the
>> Guile load path. When installing
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello!
>
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> I think it’s a bit difficult to install the Guix Workflow Language at
>> this point and I’d like to change that.
>>
>> Currently, new sub-commands for Guix are looked up by module name on the
>> Guile load path. When installing
Le 17 mars 2020 14:32:59 GMT-04:00, Joshua Branson a écrit
:
>Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>>
>> (Though eventually, I do think something like Guix Home should be
>part
>> of Guix itself. :-))
>
>May I ask is Guix Home similar to systemd homed? Or do they have
>slightly different objectives?
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> (Though eventually, I do think something like Guix Home should be part
> of Guix itself. :-))
May I ask is Guix Home similar to systemd homed? Or do they have
slightly different objectives?
--
Joshua Branson
Sent from Emacs and Gnus
Hello!
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> I think it’s a bit difficult to install the Guix Workflow Language at
> this point and I’d like to change that.
>
> Currently, new sub-commands for Guix are looked up by module name on the
> Guile load path. When installing the “gwl” package, though, the Guile
Le 19 février 2020 14:46:55 GMT-05:00, "Gábor Boskovits"
a écrit :
>This looks interesting.
>
>Ricardo Wurmus ezt írta (időpont: 2020. febr. 19.,
>Sze
>16:37):
>
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> I think it’s a bit difficult to install the Guix Workflow Language at
>> this point and I’d like to change that.
>>
This looks interesting.
Ricardo Wurmus ezt írta (időpont: 2020. febr. 19., Sze
16:37):
> Hi Guix,
>
> I think it’s a bit difficult to install the Guix Workflow Language at
> this point and I’d like to change that.
>
> Currently, new sub-commands for Guix are looked up by module name on the
>
Hi Guix,
I think it’s a bit difficult to install the Guix Workflow Language at
this point and I’d like to change that.
Currently, new sub-commands for Guix are looked up by module name on the
Guile load path. When installing the “gwl” package, though, the Guile
load path is not automatically
11 matches
Mail list logo
