Re: GSoC 2018 Syntax and semantics of systemd units in the Shepherd - 1st update

I am currently working on the implementation of .socket unit files, signalfd for signal handling, and fibers. It is mostly done, I just have to fix some issues that are left. On 06/25/18 13:47, boskov...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, could you please send us an update on your project?

Re: GSoC 2018 Syntax and semantics of systemd units in the Shepherd - 1st update

Hello, could you please send us an update on your project?

Re: GSoC 2018 Syntax and semantics of systemd units in the Shepherd - 1st update

Heya, Ioannis Panagiotis Koutsidis skribis: > Thank you a lot for your comments! I will make sure to make the changes that > you > suggested. Awesome. > As for match and things like car/cdr, I had issues with match and signal > handling > in the service file, which was why I changed it with

Re: GSoC 2018 Syntax and semantics of systemd units in the Shepherd - 1st update

Thank you a lot for your comments! I will make sure to make the changes that you suggested. As for match and things like car/cdr, I had issues with match and signal handling in the service file, which was why I changed it with a cond. As for the unit parser I also take the rest of the list via

Re: GSoC 2018 Syntax and semantics of systemd units in the Shepherd - 1st update

Hello Ioannis! Thanks for the update! Ioannis Panagiotis Koutsidis skribis: > As the 1st phase is coming to an end I decided to post my progress. I have > implemented the unit file parsing as well as some of the basic entries > supported > by it, such as ExecStart, User, Group, Restart, etc.

GSoC 2018 Syntax and semantics of systemd units in the Shepherd - 1st update

Hi Guix! As the 1st phase is coming to an end I decided to post my progress. I have implemented the unit file parsing as well as some of the basic entries supported by it, such as ExecStart, User, Group, Restart, etc. In addition, support for the systemd Restart values (on-success, on-failure,

Re: GSoC-2018 - Build daemon rewrite in Scheme Updates

Hi uniq10, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > Sandeep Subramanian skribis: > >> `build-derivation` is now using `call-with-container` >> and it seems to work well. `build-derivation` assumes >> that all the inputs needed for the derivation is already >> built and ready. As a next step I

Re: GSoC-2018 - Build daemon rewrite in Scheme Updates

Hello uniq10, Thanks for the update! Sandeep Subramanian skribis: > `build-derivation` is now using `call-with-container` > and it seems to work well. `build-derivation` assumes > that all the inputs needed for the derivation is already > built and ready. As a next step I wanted to try and

GSoC-2018 - Build daemon rewrite in Scheme Updates

Hi all, It has been two weeks since I started working on the project and I thought I will give you all a quick update regarding it. `build-derivation` is now using `call-with-container` and it seems to work well. `build-derivation` assumes that all the inputs needed for the derivation is already

Re: GSoC-2018

Hi reepca, Thank you! I will keep in touch with you on #guix. -- uniq10 On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 3:08 AM Caleb Ristvedt wrote: > Hi Sandeep/uniq10, welcome! > I'm the person that worked on the rewrite last year (I like to go by > reepca in conversations and irc). I'm

Re: GSoC-2018

Welcome Sandeep, and thank you reepca for offering to help! Ludo’.

Re: GSoC-2018

This is a great idea, I'd really love to see this come true! Good luck and happy hacking! -- Pierre Neidhardt I'm glad we don't have to play in the shade. -- Golfer Bobby Jones on being told that it was 105 degrees in the shade. signature.asc Description:

Re: GSoC-2018

Hi Sandeep/uniq10, welcome! I'm the person that worked on the rewrite last year (I like to go by reepca in conversations and irc). I'm glad that you'll be working on it this summer. I still feel like I didn't do enough last summer, though, so if there's any way I can help, I'd be glad to (though

Re: GSoC-2018

Sandeep Subramanian <sandeepsubramania...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi all, > > I am Sandeep Subramanian (uniq10) and I have been selected for the > GSoC-2018 project "Continue rewrite build daemon in Guile Scheme". > (Project description: > https://librepl

Re: GSoC-2018

2018-04-27 19:43 GMT+02:00 Sandeep Subramanian < sandeepsubramania...@gmail.com>: > Hi all, > > I am Sandeep Subramanian (uniq10) and I have been selected for the > GSoC-2018 project "Continue rewrite build daemon in Guile Scheme". > (Project description: > https

GSoC-2018

Hi all, I am Sandeep Subramanian (uniq10) and I have been selected for the GSoC-2018 project "Continue rewrite build daemon in Guile Scheme". (Project description: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix/GSoC-2018#Continue_rewrite_build_daemon_in_Guile_Scheme ) I am very excit