Leo Famulari writes:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:07:28PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>> I agree with Marius's option 5. I don't see an immediate reason to
>> remove it, and we can build icedtea-7 using gcj.
>
> I actually hadn't noticed that icedtea-7 builds with icedtea-6. I
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:07:28PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> I agree with Marius's option 5. I don't see an immediate reason to
> remove it, and we can build icedtea-7 using gcj.
I actually hadn't noticed that icedtea-7 builds with icedtea-6. I
thought it simply inherited from the package
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari writes:
> Time marches on and IcedTea 1, which provides OpenJDK 6, is approaching
> the end of its life:
>
> http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2017/01/11/discontinuation-of-support-for-icedtea-1-x/
>
> There will be one more release in the series,
Time marches on and IcedTea 1, which provides OpenJDK 6, is approaching
the end of its life:
http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2017/01/11/discontinuation-of-support-for-icedtea-1-x/
There will be one more release in the series, 1.14.0.
Thankfully, we have zero packages that depend on it,