Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.6K bytes:
[…]
> Perhaps you take hardware support in GNU/Linux for granted. When I
> started using GNU/Linux, things like sound support or graphics mode
> support or webcams would often be missing—things were a lot more
> difficult in practice. It’s the dedicated
Note: This message is of course not meant to be rude, and not meant to be "the
source of absolute truth", so please take it lightly.
Only for this message, and for the sake of easier understanding, the
term "promote" will be used in this message as synonym for the following:
install, share, sell,
Hello David,
Thanks for providing feedback.
You make it sound like GuixSD is unusable on real hardware due to the
lack of proprietary firmware, but reality is different. I think this
section I wrote a while back pretty accurately reflects the situation:
Hi Ludo,
> I knew I should have stayed on vacation!
Hope you had a nice vacation :)
> The goals haven’t changed since Day 1 though.
I realize that. When I started using/contributing to guix I was not
fully aware of what that meant.
One important thing that has changed for me is that I no
Hello David,
This is bad news for my first day back from vacations (I knew I should
have stayed on vacation! ;-)).
I’m sad to see you leave. I understand we have disagreements on the
project’s goals, and I respect that. The goals haven’t changed since
Day 1 though, and I think it’s a project
I suggest we drop this thread. It belongs elsewhere.
Pj.
+1
David Craven writes:
> Yeah exactly, you only force people to buy your crappy hardware and while
> you care so much about freedom, freedom of speech and information you do
> not give a shit about. You prefer to lie to unknowing users, telling them
> how firmware in ROM is so
Leo Famulari writes:
> Please, everyone, can we try to keep this discussion civil?
>
> The fact that we all find ourself on this mailing list makes me think
> that we all care about free software in some way or another.
>
> It's true that within that broad idea we have
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:06:19PM +0100, David Craven wrote:
> Yeah exactly, you only force people to buy your crappy hardware and while
> you care so much about freedom, freedom of speech and information you do
> not give a shit about. You prefer to lie to unknowing users, telling them
> how
I suggest we drop this thread. It belongs elsewhere.
Pj.
And the Hurd has been in development since 1990, so started at roughly the
same time as the Linux kernel. Misleading information again. Hurd and Linux
started out as competitors.
On Feb 22, 2017 3:44 PM, "Clément Lassieur" wrote:
> Also note how that line was conviniently
> Also note how that line was conviniently drawn just barely outside of what
> the Linux project was doing at the time, I guess most likely so that he
> could still find developers to build his Hurd by saying "Linux does not
> respect your freedoms"
I'm not sure what line you are talking about,
David Craven writes:
> Yeah exactly, you only force people to buy your crappy hardware and while
> you care so much about freedom, freedom of speech and information you do
> not give a shit about. You prefer to lie to unknowing users, telling them
> how firmware in ROM is so
Yeah exactly, you only force people to buy your crappy hardware and while
you care so much about freedom, freedom of speech and information you do
not give a shit about. You prefer to lie to unknowing users, telling them
how firmware in ROM is so much better while I know you're full of shit and
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 02:54:32PM +0100, David Craven wrote:
Exactly why I'm leaving. You prefer to spread and force your religion on to
people,
No we don't.
One of the defining principles of free software is that nobody is forced into
anything. And we never do it. In fact that
Exactly why I'm leaving. You prefer to spread and force your religion on to
people, and don't really care about anything other than that.
On Feb 22, 2017 05:54, "Mike Gerwitz" wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 14:13:45 +0100, David Craven wrote:
> > In most you can not. And I don't
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 14:13:45 +0100, David Craven wrote:
> In most you can not. And I don't know of a way to tell if it is
> possible without trying it.
The card will either be soldered or be inserted into a slot much like a
PCI card. It sometimes has its own area on the outside of the case;
David Craven writes:
Hi David,
> But I wish to leave the guix project and that my savannah account be
> removed. This is not a decision I make lightly. The reason why I
> decided it was time to move on is because I do not wish to be part of
> GNU or the FSF.
Sad to see you leave. There was a
> In some laptops, you can simply remove and replace the built-in wireless card.
In most you can not. And I don't know of a way to tell if it is
possible without trying it. What about laptops that don't have usb
ports anymore? Are there any free USB-C wifi dongles yet? What about
laptops that
On 17-02-16 01:14:15, David Craven wrote:
> Hello guixers!
>
> I am very grateful for all the things I could learn during my time
> here and all the awesome work that you guys put in.
>
> But I wish to leave the guix project and that my savannah account be
> removed. This is not a decision I
Tomas Cech (2017-02-20 09:59 +0100) wrote:
[...]
> So, guys, where are your GIT repositories for GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH?
There are several links here:
https://gitlab.com/rain1/guix-wiki/wikis/Packaging
--
Alex
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 14:25:51 +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> 3. Undertake extra paid employment in some activity (not necessarily computer
> related)
> which benefits the community, and spend the mony you earn to purchase harware
> on which
> GuixSD runs better.
To add: certain things (like
On 17-02-20 14:25:51, John Darrington wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:59:05AM +0100, Tomas Cech wrote:
>
> Running GuixSD on HW not fully supported by linux-libre is painful for
> me as well. I remember my first time success with GuixSD - after some
> coffee and sweating I
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:59:05AM +0100, Tomas Cech wrote:
Running GuixSD on HW not fully supported by linux-libre is painful for
me as well. I remember my first time success with GuixSD - after some
coffee and sweating I managed to deploy and boot GuixSD on my notebook
which
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 19:30:31 +0100,
Alex Kost wrote:
>
> David Craven (2017-02-17 13:56 +0100) wrote:
>
> >> I think if you posit a free software project that works in the way you
> >> describe ("on its own"), it would work very much like Guile works
> >> right now.
> >
> > An operating system
David Craven (2017-02-17 13:56 +0100) wrote:
>> I think if you posit a free software project that works in the way you
>> describe ("on its own"), it would work very much like Guile works
>> right now.
>
> An operating system has to work on all hardware. Asking people to buy a
> RYF approved
> Accepting pre-built binaries as part of kernel sources
I don't think this is true either, or has not been for a very long
time (~7y?). If you look at the dates of the commits that added binary
blobs (i.e. the firmware directory), those are many years old. It is
an active effort to move the
David Craven writes:
>> vanilla Linux (which includes more than 150MB of binary blobs)
>
> Can you provide a reference?
I can’t find it any more (I think I saw it in an interview, but I cannot
find the article any more) and it looks like I was quite wrong about
this number.
> There are many pieces of hardware that are not RYF certified and
> that work without firmware blobs.
I thought I had already argued the fact that, the fact that it works without
firmware blobs, does not mean that it is a more secure device, and in many
cases it may be much worse from a privacy
> unless they force or persuade other people to use non-free software as well
I hope this isn't a reference to the raspberry pi firmware. If you are
talking about this firmware [0], it boots Linux since the 3rd of Jan
2017. I do not follow the developments closely, but I hardly think
that this is
David Craven writes:
>> I think if you posit a free software project that works in the way you
>> describe ("on its own"), it would work very much like Guile works
>> right now.
>
> An operating system has to work on all hardware. Asking people to buy a
> RYF approved device to
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:56:04PM +0100, David Craven wrote:
> I think if you posit a free software project that works in the way you
> describe ("on its own"), it would work very much like Guile works
> right now.
An operating system has to work on all hardware. Asking
Oh... I see...
One must understand that while we mustn't
recommend/install/share/sell/teach-usage-of non-free software for the
users, they *can* do whatever they want. However, as I just said: If
they want to make use of non-free software, they are on their own, and
we should try to convince them
> I think if you posit a free software project that works in the way you
> describe ("on its own"), it would work very much like Guile works
> right now.
An operating system has to work on all hardware. Asking people to buy a
RYF approved device to run guixsd is no different than apple requiring
On Thu 16 Feb 2017 14:17, Andy Wingo writes:
> Ludo and Richard don't pass their patches by some kind of FSF approval
> board ;)
I goofed on Ricardo's name. Apologies, Ricardo!
Andy
Hi,
On Thu 16 Feb 2017 01:14, David Craven writes:
> GNU or the FSF.
FWIW as a GNU maintainer -- although I find the FSF's work to be
interesting, and I understand that you do not, it has no relation to the
work I do. I think if you posit a free software project that works in
David Craven writes:
> Hello guixers!
>
> I am very grateful for all the things I could learn during my time
> here and all the awesome work that you guys put in.
>
Thanks for your contribution. Lurking the mailing list, I remember you
have put a lot of effort into the kde
Hi David,
> I also believe that the gnu project has moved away from those core
> values and focuses instead on petitioning websites and hardware
> manufacturers to release work they have invested a lot of money in
> developing, often in very pushy and uncivil ways. Even if they
> succeed, I do not
Hi David,
> I am very grateful for all the things I could learn during my time
> here and all the awesome work that you guys put in.
…and we are grateful for your many contributions!
It’s probably obvious that you and I disagree on some of the points
you’ve made, but for the sake of onlookers
David Craven (2017-02-16 01:14 +0100) wrote:
> Hello guixers!
Hello David, thank you very much for all the great work you did for
Guix!
> I am very grateful for all the things I could learn during my time
> here and all the awesome work that you guys put in.
>
> But I wish to leave the guix
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:14:15AM +0100, David Craven wrote:
> Hello guixers!
>
> I am very grateful for all the things I could learn during my time
> here and all the awesome work that you guys put in.
>
> But I wish to leave the guix project and that my savannah account be
> removed. This is
Hello guixers!
I am very grateful for all the things I could learn during my time
here and all the awesome work that you guys put in.
But I wish to leave the guix project and that my savannah account be
removed. This is not a decision I make lightly. The reason why I
decided it was time to move
42 matches
Mail list logo