Re: Let's build 'core-updates'!

2017-11-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Heya! I’ve started an evaluation of the “core” subset of packages for ‘core-updates’: https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/core-updates#tabs-evaluations Let’s see how it goes. Ludo’.

Re: Let's build 'core-updates'!

2017-11-07 Thread Leo Famulari
7 6:05:19 AM EST To: l...@gnu.org Cc: Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name>, guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Let's build 'core-updates'! No one else mentioned it after the acl tests were enabled On November 7, 2017 11:54:47 AM GMT+02:00, l...@gnu.org wrote: >Efraim Flashner <efr...@flash

Re: Let's build 'core-updates'!

2017-11-07 Thread Efraim Flashner
No one else mentioned it after the acl tests were enabled On November 7, 2017 11:54:47 AM GMT+02:00, l...@gnu.org wrote: >Efraim Flashner skribis: > >> /gnu/store/mivyzxijvxh44g2r39071sm89vm9h0n6-make-boot0-4.2.1/bin/make >-C test/ tests >> make[1]: Entering directory

Re: Let's build 'core-updates'!

2017-11-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Efraim Flashner skribis: > /gnu/store/mivyzxijvxh44g2r39071sm89vm9h0n6-make-boot0-4.2.1/bin/make -C > test/ tests > make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-acl-2.2.52.drv-0/acl-2.2.52/test' > *** malformed-restore.test *** > Unescaped left brace in regex is illegal

Re: Let's build 'core-updates'!

2017-11-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Marius Bakke skribis: > Is there anything else we should consider this round? Maybe the > automatic wrapping from ? Yesterday I submitted this license installation patch, which should be simple enough: https://bugs.gnu.org/29161

Re: Let's build 'core-updates'!

2017-11-03 Thread Leo Famulari
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 11:29:17PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:33:02PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > > We are still missing the "binutils" update. Efraim, do you remember > > what the issue with 2.29 was? > > binutils-boot0 built fine, I don't remember what the next

Re: Let's build 'core-updates'!

2017-11-02 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:33:02PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Hello! > > 'core-updates' is a month overdue, so now is a good time to start it. > > We are still missing the "binutils" update. Efraim, do you remember > what the issue with 2.29 was? binutils-boot0 built fine, I don't remember

Let's build 'core-updates'!

2017-11-02 Thread Marius Bakke
Hello! 'core-updates' is a month overdue, so now is a good time to start it. We are still missing the "binutils" update. Efraim, do you remember what the issue with 2.29 was? Is there anything else we should consider this round? Maybe the automatic wrapping from ?