Hi,
Sorry for the long delay.
On lun., 18 mars 2024 at 16:05, Christina O'Donnell wrote:
>> 2: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39258
> As I said above, [2] is a fairly long thread, but I think I get the
> general idea. It seems that Xapian was implemented but didn't have the
> desired
Hi Simon,
Sorry for the really long delay, I meant to reply after I'd had a good
read through the conversation you linked, but I haven't had a chance to
really get into it yet, but I have read enough to get a surface idea of
the project. The project looks fun, and looks like it will help Guix
> Although I concur with this need, I do not see how it would be help for
> detecting compatibility between channels. :-)
maybe i'm overthinking this, and all we need is a way to point to git commit
ranges that are compatible.
more specifically, i'm maintaining the guix-crypto channel, and i
Hi Attila,
On mar., 06 févr. 2024 at 17:16, Attila Lendvai wrote:
>> The wishlist is: provide a machine-readable description on guix-science
>> channel side in order to help in finding the good overlap between
>> commits of different channels.
>
> i wrote about a missing abstraction here:
>
>
Hi Christina,
On sam., 03 févr. 2024 at 15:27, Christina O'Donnell wrote:
> 1. Have a script that scrapes all the define-public symbols in every
> file in
> every package.
I think you mean ’fold-packages’.
> 2. Have a script that determines the symbols needed by each file. (Macros
>
> The wishlist is: provide a machine-readable description on guix-science
> channel side in order to help in finding the good overlap between
> commits of different channels.
i wrote about a missing abstraction here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-12/msg00104.html
which is
> Anything is better than an obscure failure/backtrace
i disagree with this specific statement. in the long run, the (inconspicuous)
cost of added complexity can easily move anything into net negative territory.
IOW, feel encouraged to account for the cost of complexity. it's rarely done
Hi,
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi,
>
> Well, using Guix bdab356 from a little bit more than one month old, then
> associating the channel guix-science 0b3d4a2f last week, I get the
> failure:
>
> $ guix build /gnu/store/g3aa5rh7bs5pyxd3q1gvhwz1s9z1vh3z-guix-science.drv
> The following derivation
Hi Simon,
The wishlist is: provide a machine-readable description on guix-science
channel side in order to help in finding the good overlap between
commits of different channels.
It could be nice if instead of an hard error, “guix pull” could say:
« the channel ’guix’ needs to be at least at
Hi,
Well, using Guix bdab356 from a little bit more than one month old, then
associating the channel guix-science 0b3d4a2f last week, I get the
failure:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix build /gnu/store/g3aa5rh7bs5pyxd3q1gvhwz1s9z1vh3z-guix-science.drv
The
10 matches
Mail list logo
