Andreas Enge andr...@enge.fr skribis:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 04:03:23PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Andreas Enge andr...@enge.fr skribis:
separate ‘package-with-name-prefix’ procedure, such that we would do:
(define package-with-python-2
(compose (cut package-with-name-prefix
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:00:27PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
BTW, I haven’t check whether this is the case already, but we need
something like
(define (package-with-explicit-python p python)
;; Return a version of P built for PYTHON.
(package (inherit p) ...))
so we can just
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:52:08PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
(define pytz
(package
(name python-pytz)
...))
This is quite Debianish. I like it.
But the alternative (as I suggested in the packaging guidelines) is as
debianish:
(define python-pytz
(package
On 09/04/2013 10:51 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Thus I would do:
(define pytz
(package
(name python-pytz)
...))
And what should we call python2-pytz ?
Cyril.
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:51:17PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
However, I don’t think that scheme should be followed for variable
names: it’s tedious to type, and Guile offers mechanisms to
select/rename bindings imported from other bindings.
Thus I would do:
(define pytz
(package
