Hi, I'm reposting this with a different subject, since this question is not only related to postorius:
What do others think about the central question: Should django be a "normal" input or a "native" one? What does this depend on? What are the rules for? > I'm unsure about the correct handling of django in django-XXX. Can we > find rules for this to make future packager's life easier? > > Should django be a "normal" input or a "native" one? What does this > depend on? > > > Clear is: django-XXX should not "propagate" django: > > * django is a framework, django-XXX is an extension for this framework. > * If some application is using django-XXX, I'd expect it to have > django specified as "input", too, since primary it is a django > application. Maybe even djangoXXX is an optional component > > > Just for the records: > > * django-XXX should propagate other django extension it requires. > o If some application is using django-XXX, if should not care > about other django extensions django-XXX requires. This is the > same like as it does not have to care about other python > packages django-XXX requires. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
