Hi Konrad,
On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 12:18, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> My point of view (long form:
> https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02117588)
> is that software projects should adopt a backwards compatibility policy
> early on, state it clearly in their documentation, and stick to it. That
>
Hi Ludo,
> Clearly there’s a tension between that and keeping Guix open to changes.
That's indeed the main problem and here as elsewhere, it is often a
topic of heated arguments.
My point of view (long form:
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02117588)
is that software projects should adopt a
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 17:31, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> The hard question then becomes: what do we call it? I vote against
> abbreviations. :-)
"guix shell"?
Cheers,
simon
